TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Good Law | Bad Law – Aaron Freiwald

    Good Law | Bad Law is a weekly podcast featuring Attorney Aaron Freiwald and guests taking stories from the headlines and from the courtroom and discussing how and why the law matters to every American. Come join us and our guests every Friday for an informative and fun conversation! Submit your questions and topic suggestions on Facebook or Twitter to have them discussed on the show.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © Copyright 2016 . All rights reserved.

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    The Fraud of "Voting Fraud:" A Conversation w/ Scott Cummings Nov 13, 2020
    Show notes

    Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by Professor Scott Cummings, of UCLA Law, to discuss legal ethics, our electoral system, and the recent rash of election lawsuits being filed in court by the Trump campaign.

    It hasn’t been a week since news broke of former Vice-President Joe Biden’s presidential victory and yet, President Trump and his re-election team have filed countless lawsuits asserting that the results of the election are invalid due to unsubstantiated claims of fraud. In today’s episode, Aaron and Scott discuss these frivolous lawsuits, their potentially damaging effects, and the lawyers who are bringing them. What are the issues at play? And will these attorneys face punishment for their roles in bringing bogus claims?

    Professor Cummings is the Robert Henigson Professor of Legal Ethics and a Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, where he teaches and writes about the legal profession, public interest law, law and social movements, and community economic development. He is the faculty director of Legal Ethics and the Profession (LEAP), a program promoting research and programming on the challenges facing the contemporary legal profession. Professor Cummings is also a long-time member of the UCLA David J. Epstein Program in Public Interest Law and Policy, a specialization training students to become public interest lawyers.

    A graduate of both Berkeley (B.A.) and Harvard (J.D.), Professor Cummings’ research is focused on economic development, law and social movements, and the legal professional. He is the co-author of the first public interest law textbook, Public Interest Lawyering: A Contemporary Perspective (with Alan Chen), and co-editor of a leading legal profession casebook, Legal Ethics (with Deborah Rhode, David Luban, and Nora Engstrom).

    Listen now to learn more!

    To learn more about Professor Cummings and to view a list of his publications, please click here.

    Host: Aaron Freiwald

    Guest: Scott Cummings

    Follow Good Law | Bad Law:

    YouTube: Good Law | Bad Law

    Facebook: @GOODLAWBADLAW

    Instagram: @GoodLawBadLaw

    Website: https://www.law-podcast.com


    Expand the Court: A Conversation w/ Michael Klarman Nov 06, 2020
    Show notes

    Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by Professor Michael Klarman, of Harvard Law, to discuss the notion of expanding the Supreme Court, the 2020 election and its potential outcomes, political history, and what Justice Barrett’s recent conformation could mean for our future. Aaron and Michael have a truly riveting conversation that covers many critical topics which may prove paramount to our country’s democratic future.

    We post this episode days after one of the most contentious and important election nights of our lifetime. In today’s episode, Aaron and Michael talk about entrenching democracy and how this is absolutely a moment of opportunity. Delving into all of the relevant topics of this week, Michael and Aaron touch on the electorate, the Constitution, geographic clustering, race, voter suppression and more. Michael explains why he believes it absolutely necessary to expand the Court, exploring both the arguments for and against this idea, as well as why in his opinion we as a society can’t afford not to. Aaron and Michael discuss the electoral college, the future of Roe v. Wade, the role of politics in the Supreme Court and the potential agenda of conservative Justices, court legitimacy, and the questions surrounding the future of our institutions’ norms. Is the system broken?

    Professor Klarman is the Kirkland & Ellis Professor at Harvard Law School. He received his B.A. and M.A. in political theory from the University of Pennsylvania, his J.D. from Sandford and his D. Phil. In legal history from the University of Oxford. After law school, Professor Klarman clerked for the Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit before joining the faculty at the University of Virginia School of Law. He has won numerous awards for his teaching and scholarship, which are primarily in the areas of Constitutional Law and Constitutional History. In 2009 he was inducted into the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. Professor Klarman is also a published author; he is currently working on a revisionist history of the Founding.

    Listen now to learn more!

    To learn more about Professor Klarman and to find a list of his publications, please click here.

    To read Professor Klarman’s recent Q&A feature in the Harvard Gazette, please click here.

    Host: Aaron Freiwald

    Guests: Michael J. Klarman

    Follow Good Law | Bad Law:

    YouTube: Good Law | Bad Law

    Facebook: @GOODLAWBADLAW

    Instagram: @GoodLawBadLaw

    Website: https://www.law-podcast.com


    Youth Vote to the Rescue: A Conversation w/ Olivia Freiwald & Violet Massie-Vereker Oct 29, 2020
    Show notes

    Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by two climate youth activists and electoral organizers, Olivia Freiwald, 21, and Violet Massie-Vereker, 19, both of the Sunrise Movement and of the Down Ballot Disruption Project (DBDP), to discuss youth voting, the 2020 election, the importance of galvanizing youth political efforts, and the impact the youth will undoubtedly have on our future.

    What is the DBDP? Why is the Green New Deal so important?

    In today’s episode, Aaron, Olivia, and Violet have an inspiring conversation on the possibilities of change. With the 2020 election days away, today’s conversation is paramount. Motivated at young ages, both Olivia and Violet, explain how their personal experiences have shaped their current political vision, the two talk about the climate crisis, electoral organizing, “sleepy dems,” awareness, responsibility and how to think big. Violet and Olivia discuss their frustration with the current power imbalance they see in politics but also the ways in which they are excited for the future. Aaron, Olivia, and Violet talk about the advantage younger people have in understanding how to use technology effectively and efficiently as well as the role of relationship organizing and social media networks.

    Founded in 2017, Sunrise is a youth movement to stop climate change and to create millions of good jobs in the process. The idea is to “build an army” of young people to make climate change an urgent priority across America, end the “corrupting influence of fossil fuel executives on politics,” and elect leaders who stand up for the health and wellbeing of all people. Through talking to neighbors, families, religious leaders, classmates, and teachers, Sunrise spreads their message; “our strength and work is rooted in our local communities, and we are always growing in number.”

    The Down Ballot Disruption Project, or DBDP, equips “young people across the country with the skills, resources, and support they need to elect progressive leaders in their communities.” From the school board to Congress, down ballot politics have the biggest influence on our everyday lives, yet their races are historically de-prioritized. Everything from voter services, to pipeline approvals, to police funding is governed by local offices; DBDP highlights that the difference between victory and defeat often comes down to less than 1,000 votes. This November, the DBDP is hopeful to elicit change by electing a “new generation of leaders who care about our future.”

    We’re posting this episode early to remind you once again how critical it is that everyone votes – every voice matters. Please make sure you have a plan for how to vote!

    Listen in now!

    To learn more about the Down Ballot Disruption Project, please click here.

    To learn more about the Sunrise Movement, please click here.

    To learn more about The Green New Deal, please click here.

    Host: Aaron Freiwald

    Guests: Olivia Freiwald & Violet Massie-Vereker

    Follow Good Law | Bad Law:

    YouTube: Good Law | Bad Law

    Facebook: @GOODLAWBADLAW

    Instagram: @GoodLawBadLaw

    Website: https://www.law-podcast.com


    Justice for Justice (the horse): A Conversation w/ Matthew Liebman Oct 23, 2020
    Show notes

    Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by law professor and advocate, Matthew Liebman, of the University of San Francisco, to discuss animal rights and the notion of animal law.

    Who is a “rights holder” under the law? In today’s episode, Aaron and Matthew explore this idea as they delve into the arguments about animal rights and the law and how the law is applied to nonhuman animals. In discussing strategic impact litigation, the question of property vs. life, compassion, and animal ethics, Matthew and Aaron talk about the animal law movement and what our obligations to animals are. Matthew touches on a groundbreaking case he is currently involved with, Justice v. Gwendolyn Vercher, that the Animal Legal Defense Fund filed on behalf of an 8-year-old horse named Justice. Throughout today’s conversation, Aaron and Matthew talk about the importance of animal rights, animal ethics and of making good law.

    Professor Liebman joined the USF faculty in 2020 as the endowed Justice for Animals chair, as well as an associate professor of law. Before USF, Matthew was the director of litigation for the Animal Legal Defense Fund, where he litigated animal protection cases, including groundbreaking cases to defend the First Amendment rights of activists and to establish fundamental legal rights for nonhuman animals, for 12 years. Professor Liebman has co-authored the book “A Worldview of Animal Law,” which examines how the legal systems of different countries govern our interactions with animals and often appears as a frequent media commentator on animal law issues. Professor Liebman’s writing has appeared in the Animal Law Review, the Journal of Animal Law, the Stanford Environmental Law Journal, and the Animal Legal & Historical Web Center. Professor Liebman clerked for the Honorable Warren J. Ferguson of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

    Listen in now!

    To learn more about Professor Liebman, please visit his bio page here.

    To learn more about the Animal Legal Defense Fund please click here.

    To learn more about the study of Animal Law at USF, please click here.

    To learn more about Justice v. Gwendolyn Vercher, please click here.

    Host: Aaron Freiwald

    Guest: Matthew Liebman

    Follow Good Law | Bad Law:

    YouTube: Good Law | Bad Law

    Facebook: @GOODLAWBADLAW

    Instagram: @GoodLawBadLaw

    Website: https://www.law-podcast.com


    A Handmaid’s Tale: A Conversation w/ Eileen Hunt Botting Oct 16, 2020
    Show notes

    Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by Political Science Professor, Dr. Eileen Hunt Botting, of the University of Notre Dame, to discuss this week’s Supreme Court confirmation proceedings of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, the impact that these hearings will have on our Court, our country, and our history, as well as what this moment in time will mean moving forward.

    As yesterday marked the final day of Judge Barrett’s confirmation hearings, the country waits to see if Judge Barrett will assume Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat on the Court. Today’s conversation is paramount– Aaron and Eileen breakdown the fundamental problems at play in the refusal to halt Judiciary Committee proceedings until after the November election, detail Judge Barrett’s professional career and missteps in and since accepting the nomination, and debate whether or not our democratic foundation is in jeopardy. Professor Botting is one of more than 80 Notre Dame colleagues who penned a letter to Judge Barrett urging her to suspend her nomination for three critical reasons – 1. Voting for the next president is already underway, 2. It was RBG’s dying wish that her seat not be filled until after the election, and 3. The United States is in a crisis. Eileen and Aaron explore these reasons as they touch on the ideas of political polarization, the pandemic, political strategy and evasiveness, American exceptionalism, originalism, the Constitution as well as the broader ideas of dystopian literature, women’s rights, the writings of our Founding Fathers and Mothers, hope, equality and liberty, 18th century political thought and more.

    A graduate of both Cambridge and Yale, Dr. Botting is a political theorist whose scholarly interests cover modern political thought, feminism, the family, rights, ethics of technology, philosophy and literature. Eileen’s research and teaching interests include Political Theory, Comparative Political Theory, History of Political Thought and consist of such subjects as Enlightenment, American, Feminist, Liberal, and International Political Thought. A published author, some of her books are: “Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau on the Transformation of the Family (SUNY, 2006), “Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women’s Human Rights” (Yale, 2016), and “Mary Shelley and the Rights of the Child: Political Philosophy in ‘Frankenstein’ (Penn Press, 2017,) plus several edited volumes and scholarly editions. Professor Botting has two new books forthcoming in 2020 and she has received grants and fellowships to support her writing. Her essays, political analyses, and opinion pieces have appeared in Aeon Magazine, The Washington Post, The New York Times, and The TLS.

    Listen in now!

    To learn more about Professor Botting, please visit her Notre Dame bio page here.

    To read Professor Botting’s article, “Amy Coney Barrett’s Fall from Grace: A Rose Garden superspreader event puts in doubt the Supreme Court nominee’s commitment to the right to life,” please click here.

    To read, “An Open Letter to Judge Amy Coney Barrett From Your Notre Dame Colleagues,” please click here.

    Host: Aaron Freiwald

    Guest: Eileen Hunt Botting

    Follow Good Law | Bad Law:

    YouTube: Good Law | Bad Law

    Facebook: @GOODLAWBADLAW

    Instagram: @GoodLawBadLaw

    Website: https://www.law-podcast.com


    Repost: Defund the Police? A Conversation w/ Alex Vitale Oct 09, 2020
    Show notes

    What does it mean to “defund the police”?

    Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by Professor Alex S. Vitale, of Brooklyn College, to discuss “defunding” the police.

    Many protester signs carry this slogan. And the President is stoking fears among voters through his dark “911” video political ads. Aaron and Alex dive deep into the topic to explore what it would actually mean to end policing as we know it.

    What role have police played in our communities historically? Whose safety and interests were the police protecting? Slaves or Slave-owners? Workers or Industrialists? Is the ideal we all have that police are in the business of keeping all of us safe, all of us equally safe more a myth than a reality?

    Should police be in the business of “law enforcement” in schools? Rounding up the homeless and the mentally ill? Filling our prisons with low-level drug offenders? Should these functions be in the hands of counselors and social workers and other community oriented professionals, rather than armed police?

    Do police reforms even work? The police department in Minneapolis that employed the officer who killed George Floyd offered training in implicit bias; had policies and procedures; had committed to greater diversity in hiring,

    Are there better ways to spend the vast resources now spent on policing? Could we improve public safety better, actually reduce suffering and crime if we dedicated resources to communities in need and attacked the roots of social and economic harm that give rise to crime?

    These are challenging and difficult questions. We need to have a conversation about this and understand the facts and not react reflexively. We hope this episode is a start.

    Alex is a Professor of Sociology in the School of Humanities and Social Justice, as well as a Coordinator of the Policing and Social Justice Project at Brooklyn College and is a Visiting Professor at London Southbank University. He has spent the last 30 years writing about policing and consults both police departments and human rights organizations internationally. Professor Vitale’s expertise is in sociology, policing, community policing, civil disorder, demonstrations, crime, alternatives to incarceration, youth violence, gangs, drug policy, school safety, sex work, social movements and urban politics. In addition to The End of Policing, Alex is also the author of City of Disorder: How the Quality of Life Campaign Transformed New York. His academic writings on policing have appeared in Policing and Society, Police Practice and Research, Mobilization, and Contemporary Sociology. Professor Vitale is also a frequent essayist, whose writings have appeared in The New York Times, Washington Post, The Guardian, The Nation, Vice News, Fortune, and USA Today.

    Listen in to learn more!

    To learn more about Professor Vitale, please visit his bio page here.

    Please out check out Alex’s personal website here for further publications, resources, announcements and more.

    To learn more about Alex’s book, The End of Policing, please click here.

    To learn more about the Policing and Social Justice Project at Brooklyn College please visit their website here.

    Host: Aaron Freiwald

    Guest: Alex S. Vitale


    Repost: Will Trump Go? A Conversation w/ Lawrence Douglas Oct 02, 2020
    Show notes

    If Trump loses in November, what will he do? What could happen? Will it be a complete meltdown of our electoral and political system? Or worse?

    As this week marks the first presidential debate in the 2020 election, we are reposting our conversation with Professor Lawrence Douglas. Originally episode #196, this discussion is absolutely critical as November approaches.

    Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by Lawrence Douglas, a professor of law, jurisprudence, and social thought at Amherst College and the author of a new book, Will He Go?: Trump and the Looming Election Meltdown in 2020. In this episode, Aaron and Lawrence tackle what will happen if Trump loses the election but refuses to concede defeat – discussing the notion of electoral integrity, the role of the electoral college and the other ways the system we have for electing our president is antiquated and dysfunctional.

    In short, the potential for dirty tricks, even election fraud and political crisis-making is great and it is real.

    In advance of the 2020 election, Lawrence prepares readers of “Will He Go?” for the possibility of a less-than-peaceful transition of power. What legal and extra-legal paths could Trump pursue in mobilizing a challenge? Lawrence considers the chaos that could unfold if Trump loses a closely contested election. Aaron and Lawrence talk about Trump’s base, what past tumultuous elections have taught us about ways the election train could run right off the tracks this year, the increasing importance of mail-in ballots and “the big blue shift,” the impact of the pandemic on voting, and much more.

    What could the fallout be? Can our democracy snap back from Trump?

    Professor Douglas is the author of seven books, including The Right Wrong Man: John Demjanjuk and the Last Great Nazi War Crimes Trial, a New York Times “Editor’s Choice,” and has published two novels. His commentary and essays have appeared in Harper’s, The Washington Post, The New York Times, and The Lost Angeles Times; and he is a regular contributor to the Times Literary Supplement and The Guardian (US), where he is also a contributing opinion writer. A Yale Law graduate, Lawrence teaches interdisciplinary courses to a range of students, some first-term, while others are designed for juniors and seniors. Professor Douglas’ courses ask students to see the law not as a narrow system of rules, but as a complex system that serves to constitute and maintain ordered patterns of social life.

    How might Trump engineer his refusal to acknowledge electoral defeat? Listen now to find out!

    To learn more about Professor Douglas, please visit his bio page here.

    To check out Professor Douglas’ new book, Will He Go?: Trump and the Looming Election Meltdown in 2020, please click here.

    Host: Aaron Freiwald

    Guest: Lawrence Douglas

    Follow Good Law | Bad Law:

    YouTube: Good Law | Bad Law

    Facebook: @GOODLAWBADLAW

    Instagram: @GoodLawBadLaw

    Website: https://www.law-podcast.com


    The Menace of Economic Insecurity: A Conversation w/ Michael Graetz Sep 25, 2020
    Show notes

    Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by Professor Michael Graetz, of Columbia Law School, to discuss economic instability, politics and policy, and Professor Graetz’s new co-authored book, “The Wolf at the Door: The Menace of Economic Insecurity and How to Fight it.”

    Are we in a time of crisis? In today’s conversation, Aaron and Michael delve deep into the questions of American politics, globalization, the world economy, healthcare and more. In “The Wolf at the Door,” Michael and his co-author, Ian Shapiro, of Yale, explore the meaning and origins of economic insecurity and how it affects Americans’ pocket books and also their politics. Michael explains that Americans are concerned about losing what they have, whether jobs, status, or safe communities. “They fear the wolf at the door.” Aaron and Michael touch on private industry, legislative politics, employment, the pandemic and its impact, the November election, Trump’s Administration and the American political system at large, infrastructure, protectionism, and the notion of universal adjustment assistance. “The Wolf at the Door” proposes realistic policy solutions and strategies to make individuals and communities more secure, throughout this episode Michaels expands on these ideas as he and Aaron talk about increasing jobs, improving wages, protecting families suffering from unemployment, and the importance of better health care opportunities.

    A leading expert on national and international tax law, Professor Graetz joined the Columbia faculty in 2009, after 25 years at Yale Law School, where he is a professor of law emeritus and a professorial lecturer. He has written on a wide range of tax, international taxation, health policy, and social insurance issues. His recent scholarship has focused on U.S. legal history and problems around economic inequality. Professor Graetz has been invited to testify as an expert witness on a variety of tax matters before U.S. House Representatives Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee on Finance. His honors include being elected to the American Academy of Arts & Sciences and chosen a John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Fellow. In 2013, Professor Graetz was awarded the National Tax Association’s Daniel M. Holland Medal for lifetime achievement in the study of the theory and practice of public finance.

    Listen in to learn more!

    To learn more about Professor Graetz, and to view a complete list of his publications, please visit his Columbia bio page here.

    To check out Professor Graetz’s latest book, “The Wolf at the Door: The Menace of Economic Insecurity and How to Fight it,” please click here.

    Host: Aaron Freiwald

    Guest: Michael Graetz

    Follow Good Law | Bad Law:

    YouTube: Good Law | Bad Law

    Facebook: @GOODLAWBADLAW

    Instagram: @GoodLawBadLaw

    Website: https://www.law-podcast.com


    Repost: Notorious RBG and Her Incredible Legacy: A Conversation w/ Scott Dodson Sep 21, 2020
    Show notes

    Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by Professor Scott Dodson, of UC Hastings College of Law, to discuss Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, as well as Scott’s book on the legal legend, The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Today, Aaron and Scott talk about R.B.G’s past, her stunning career, her amazing achievements, and her incredible impact on modern law.

    A legal icon, R.B.G has had a profound impact on the way we think about everything from gender equality to civil procedure. Scott’s book is a collection of essays that draws together thoughtful contributors from a wide range of fields to provide a rich and compelling account of Justice Ginsburg’s career. In more than four decades as a lawyer, professor, appellate judge, and associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Ginsburg has influenced the law and society in real and permanent ways. Aaron and Scott talk about how R.B.G has helped shape our world, discussing her past and exploring the historical contexts in which she pushed gender boundaries and broke barriers. Reliving Justice Ginsburg’s storied career, Scott and Aaron, touch on glass ceilings, equal protection, the Constitution and more.

    An expert in civil procedure and federal courts, Scott has written more than eighty papers appearing in Stanford Law Review, New York University Law Review, Michigan Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, California Law Review, Virginia Law Review, Duke Law Journal, Northwestern University Law Review, Georgetown Law Journal, Vanderbilt Law Review, and several peer-reviewed journals, among others. He is the author of six books, including the one at the center of today’s conversation. His writings have been cited in more than twenty court opinions, including by the Alabama, Nebraska, and Texas Supreme Courts, and the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits; Professor Dodson also is a frequent news commentator, appearing on a variety of shows, and is quoted in various print media and blogs.

    Prior to his appointment as the inaugural Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr. Distinguished Professor of Law, Professor Dodson held the James Edgar Hervey Chair in Litigation. Before joining UC Hastings, Scott held a permanent faculty appointment at William & Mary Law school from 2009-2012 and at the University of Arkansas School of Law from 2006-2009. Professor Dodson teaches courses in Civil Procedure, Civil Litigation Concentration, Federal Courts, Comparative Civil Procedure, and Conflict of Laws.

    To learn more about Professor Dodson and to access the list of his publications, please follow the link to his bio page at UC Hastings by clicking here.

    To learn more about Professor Dodson’s book, The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, please click here.

    Host: Aaron Freiwald

    Guest: Scott Dodson

    Follow Good Law | Bad Law:

    YouTube: Good Law | Bad Law

    Instagram: @GoodLawBadLaw

    Website: https://www.law-podcast.com


    Science and Proving Harm: A Conversation w/ Carl Cranor Sep 18, 2020
    Show notes

    Aaron Freiwald, Managing Partner of Freiwald Law and host of the weekly podcast, Good Law | Bad Law, is joined by Philosophy Professor Carl Cranor, of the University of California, Riverside, to discuss toxic chemical exposure and the legal challenges in proving when a dangerous chemical or substance causes harm.

    In today’s conversation, Aaron and Carl delve deep into the intersection between law and science. The author of numerous books and articles on today’s topic, Carl’s areas of interest include legal and moral philosophy, specifically issues concerning risks, science and the law, the regulation of carcinogens and developmental toxicants, and the use of scientific evidence in legal decisions. Carl and Aaron talk about a variety of things throughout this episode, ranging from tort litigation to the Trump administration. Aaron and Carl explore the differences between regulating pharmaceuticals and pesticides in comparison to toxins as well as what tools we as a society have to establish whether or not something is in fact safe or harmful. Statistical significance, the role of Judges, the EPA, philosophical values and ethics, toxicology and epidemiology, and the notion of “certain science” are all topics Aaron and Carl touch on. Are we in the middle of an assault on science?

    A graduate of both UCLA (Ph.D.) and Yale Law School (M.S.L.), Dr. Cranor is a Distinguished Professor of Philosophy and a Faculty Member of the Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program at UC Riverside. Professor Cranor has focused much of his career on the morality, legality, and justice of exposure to toxic molecules that could threaten the public’s health. He has written widely on philosophic issues concerning, risks, science and the law, the use of scientific evidence in legal decisions for regulating carcinogens and developmental toxicants, the idea of acceptable risks, protection of susceptible populations, and how society might approach the regulation of new technologies and toxicants to better protect the public’s health. At the undergraduate level he has taught courses on ethics, political philosophy, law and society, legal philosophy, environmental ethics, justice and utilitarianism, among others. At the graduate level seminars have included, philosophy of the tort law, legal philosophy, and the idea of acceptable risks. He has served on science advisory panels as well as on Institute of Medicine and National Academy of Sciences Committees. Professor Cranor was the National Romanell-Phi Beta Kappa Professor in Philosophy for 2014-2015.

    Listen in to learn more!

    To learn more about Professor Cranor, and to see a full-list of his publications, please visit his bio page here.

    To check out Tragic Failures: How and Why We Are Harmed by Toxic Chemicals, please click here.

    To read Professor Cranor’s co-authored article, “The Use and Misuse of Bradford Hill in U.S. Tort Law,” please click here.

    To read Professor Cranor’s article, “Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products: Advances in General Causation Testimony in Toxic Tort Litigation,” please click here.

    Host: Aaron Freiwald

    Guest: Carl Cranor

    Follow Good Law | Bad Law:

    YouTube: Good Law | Bad Law

    Facebook: @GOODLAWBADLAW

    Instagram: @GoodLawBadLaw

    Website: https://www.law-podcast.com


    Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 20 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights