Department of Justice (DOJ) News

Latest Episodes:

DOJ Cracks Down on Data Leaks, Shifts Priorities on White-Collar Crime Jul 25, 2025

Show notes

Thanks for joining us. This week, the Department of Justice is making headlines as it officially begins enforcement of its new Data Security Program, or DSP, which targets the prevention of sensitive data transfers to foreign adversaries. After a 90-day grace period, enforcement is now in full effect—marking a hard line in protecting national security. The DOJ warns that companies and individuals must be in “full compliance” and signals strict action against those who ignore these rules. This policy, which enjoys bipartisan roots dating to the previous administration, reflects a robust “America First” approach to national security and economic competition. That’s not the only shake-up coming from the DOJ. Just recently, the department unveiled sweeping changes to how it approaches white-collar crime. DOJ Criminal Division chief Matthew Galeotti put it this way: “White collar crime remains a significant threat to U.S. interests, but unchecked enforcement can harm American enterprise.” New priorities include a commitment to fairness and efficiency. Prosecutors are being told to pursue alternatives to corporate criminal prosecution and offer paths to leniency for companies that cooperate and self-disclose wrongdoing. The DOJ will only impose heavy-handed monitoring when absolutely necessary, which experts believe is designed to support business innovation while still holding bad actors accountable. For context, businesses across the U.S. will need to adapt quickly. Legal analysts expect stricter enforcement actions against companies with foreign ties under the DSP, meaning compliance costs may rise and corporate leaders should be vigilant about internal controls. For citizens, these moves aim to safeguard data privacy and economic security—helping ensure jobs and sensitive information aren’t put at risk by foreign adversaries. State and local governments may also feel ripple effects. The DOJ's new enforcement posture could see federal prosecutors more actively stepping in where local policies, such as "sanctuary" laws or noncooperation with federal authorities, conflict with what the DOJ defines as national interests. As seen in the recent DOJ lawsuit against New York City over its sanctuary city laws, federal-state tensions around immigration enforcement are only likely to intensify. Attorney General Pam Bondi said, “If New York City won’t stand up for the safety of its citizens, we will.” Internationally, renewed focus on “America First” policies and targeting foreign entities may strain relations with some foreign partners but is designed to fortify American control over critical data and financial systems. For those looking to get involved, the DOJ offers updated compliance guides and FAQs on its website. Businesses and individuals with questions about their obligations under the DSP are encouraged to review those resources and seek legal counsel if needed. The DOJ is clear: enforcement is here, and ignorance is no excuse. Looking ahead, l This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

DOJ Cracks Down on Data Breaches and Corporate Misconduct Jul 21, 2025

Show notes

Welcome back to the DOJ Weekly Brief, your source for the latest developments from the Department of Justice that shape our country, our businesses, and our everyday lives. I’m glad you’re here. This week’s biggest headline is the DOJ’s enforcement of its new Data Security Program. As of July 9, the Justice Department began actively enforcing rules to prevent sensitive U.S. data from ending up in the hands of foreign adversaries. This follows a 90-day grace period allowing companies to adapt. Now, full compliance is not optional—companies face strict oversight and the standard for finding a violation is high. DOJ officials stress that ignorance or delay in compliance won’t be tolerated, and Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen recently underscored, “Expect the National Security Division to pursue appropriate enforcement with respect to any violations.” This program has the staying power of a bipartisan initiative, having survived the handover between administrations, and it directly aligns with President Trump’s “America First” agenda, tightening national security controls across the board. In parallel, the DOJ released significant new policies for prosecuting white-collar crime. Emphasizing fairness and efficiency, the Department updated its approach to corporate enforcement. The new policies encourage voluntary self-disclosure: companies that quickly come forward before DOJ independently learns of their misconduct could avoid prosecution altogether or see reductions in criminal fines of up to 75 percent. DOJ Criminal Division Chief Matthew Galeotti put it simply: “The key here is self-disclosure.” There’s also a renewed focus on healthcare fraud, trade fraud, and money laundering connected to transnational crime—areas of high impact for both the public and private sectors. For American citizens, these moves mean stronger safeguards for your personal data and potentially more effective deterrents against white-collar misconduct that can undermine savings, jobs, and public trust. Businesses, especially those dealing with sensitive data or in heavily regulated sectors, need to quickly adapt compliance programs and consider how self-disclosure options might limit risk. State and local governments may see increased federal oversight, especially where local enforcement is perceived as lacking—an approach consistent with broader DOJ strategy shifts detailed in Project 2025, including a possible uptick in federal presence in local jurisdictions with crime challenges. On the public engagement front, the DOJ has made compliance guides and FAQs for the new Data Security Program publicly available. If you’re a business owner or IT leader, these tools are essential reading to avoid costly violations. For concerned citizens, watch for upcoming public webinars hosted by the DOJ to answer questions on both the Data Security Program and evolving enforcement policies. Looking ahead, expect continued enforcement in the data security arena and close atten This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

DOJ's New Antitrust Whistleblower Program & Evolving Policies on Citizenship, White-Collar Crime Jul 18, 2025

Show notes

This week’s most significant headline from the Department of Justice is the launch of a first-of-its-kind Antitrust Whistleblower Rewards Program. Announced on July 8, this new initiative offers individuals up to 30% of any criminal fine collected if they voluntarily provide original, actionable information on criminal antitrust violations. DOJ Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater described this program as “a new pipeline of leads” that will strengthen investigations and enhance corporate accountability. For American businesses, this means increased scrutiny on antitrust compliance, so now is the time for companies to review their internal reporting systems and refresh compliance training. It’s not just in antitrust where DOJ is making waves. Last month, the department issued a memo prioritizing denaturalization cases, directing attorneys to focus on stripping citizenship from naturalized Americans involved in serious crimes, such as child exploitation. Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate emphasized, “The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.” According to data cited in the memo, nearly 25 million Americans are naturalized citizens, making this a development with significant reach and implications for immigrant communities who have become citizens. On top of these enforcement moves, DOJ leadership continues to sharpen its policies on white-collar crime. In May, the department rolled out revised guidance balancing robust prosecution of corporate wrongdoing with the goal of minimizing unnecessary burdens on American enterprise. The Criminal Division’s head, Matthew Galeotti, explained that “overbroad and unchecked corporate and white-collar enforcement burdens U.S. businesses and harms U.S. interests.” DOJ is now asking prosecutors to focus on efficiency, fairness, and expediency—pursuing alternatives to criminal charges for corporations that cooperate, and reserving heavy-handed measures like corporate monitorships for only the most serious cases. For everyday Americans, these changes could mean a DOJ that’s more responsive to threats against consumers and the marketplace, but also one that’s increasingly active in areas like citizenship status and local law enforcement oversight. Businesses should be prepared for heightened reporting and compliance expectations. For state and local governments, the DOJ’s evolving role could affect jurisdiction over criminal enforcement and might accelerate partnerships on fraud and public safety cases. Looking to the weeks ahead, the DOJ is preparing to hold public forums about its new whistleblower program and plans to issue additional guidance on denaturalization procedures. Citizens can engage by attending these sessions or by submitting comments when invitations for public input are posted on the DOJ’s website. For more details on these actions and access to resources, visit justice.gov. This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

DOJ Cracks Down on Healthcare Fraud, Corporate Enforcement Shifts Focus Jul 14, 2025

Show notes

The most significant news out of the Department of Justice this week is the launch of a new joint working group with the Department of Health and Human Services to crack down on healthcare fraud. Announced on July 2nd, this DOJ-HHS False Claims Act Working Group is set to ramp up investigations and use advanced data analytics to identify new fraud patterns in the healthcare sector. Last year alone, DOJ recovered more than $2.9 billion from False Claims Act cases, and this intensified focus signals that enforcement is only accelerating. Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brenna Jenny, who’s co-leading the group, says it will leverage cross-agency collaboration and novel legal strategies to ensure the most serious and provable complaints are prosecuted, aiming to “combat and deter healthcare fraud” more efficiently. This move comes amid broader DOJ policy shifts on white-collar and corporate enforcement. In a major address this May, Criminal Division head Matthew Galeotti said the department is seeking a new balance: robustly prosecuting corporate wrongdoing without placing unnecessary burdens on American businesses. The DOJ is emphasizing alternatives to criminal prosecution for corporations, encouraging cooperation and self-disclosure, and aiming to avoid stifling innovation through overbroad enforcement. Galeotti stated, “We must root out insidious conduct, but we can’t let enforcement punish legitimate risk-taking or hinder economic growth.” The DOJ will now prioritize focus, fairness, and efficiency—prosecuting the worst offenses quickly and using heavy-handed interventions like corporate monitors only when absolutely necessary. There’s also big news in data security. July marks the start of DOJ enforcement for its new Bulk Sensitive Data Rule, first issued this spring. As outlined by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, these new rules prohibit bulk data transfers to foreign adversaries—making it much harder for countries of concern to access Americans’ personal or government-related data. The DOJ describes these threats as an “unusual and extraordinary” risk to national security, and enforcement aims to close the loopholes that foreign entities could exploit by simply buying or demanding Americans’ data. These developments have real-world impacts. For citizens, tighter healthcare fraud controls help protect both taxpayer money and patient safety. For businesses, particularly healthcare and tech firms, the DOJ’s shift to encourage voluntary cooperation and streamline investigations could mean fewer burdens for those acting in good faith—while increasing the risk for those trying to skirt the law. State and local governments may see more federal involvement, especially as the DOJ signals it will intervene in local cases where it perceives “rule of law deficiencies.” Internationally, the new data security measures could complicate business for foreign firms and impact U.S. allies and adversaries alike, as data flows are more tightly regulate This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

DOJ Enforces New Data Security Rule, Launches Healthcare Fraud Crackdown and Whistleblower Rewards Jul 11, 2025

Show notes

This week’s top headline from the Department of Justice is enforcement: as of July 8, the DOJ’s landmark rule restricting the transfer of Americans’ sensitive personal data to countries of concern is officially in force. The 90-day grace period for organizations to comply has ended, and businesses of all sizes are now expected to fully meet the DOJ’s Data Security Program requirements. This move aims to safeguard everything from biometric and financial details to precise location and health data against exploitation by foreign adversaries. Civil penalties for violations can reach up to twice the value of each unlawful transaction. According to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, this program “makes getting that data a lot harder” for those who would use it to threaten U.S. national security. The impact is sweeping: American businesses, especially those dealing in large volumes of personal or U.S. government-related data, must now conduct rigorous risk assessments and implement new compliance tools or face significant penalties. For state and local governments, particularly those collaborating with private contractors or tech partners, the Rule introduces fresh audit and record-keeping obligations. Internationally, this step signals a more assertive American posture on data security and digital sovereignty. The list of affected countries includes China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela. Organizations have until October 6 to complete enhanced due diligence and audit requirements. On the enforcement and public safety front, the DOJ and Department of Health and Human Services have just launched the False Claims Act Working Group to escalate efforts against healthcare fraud. In 2024 alone, DOJ secured over $2.9 billion in settlements and judgments related to healthcare fraud. This new group will leverage cross-agency collaboration and advanced data analytics to identify and prosecute fraudulent activity. Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brenna Jenny emphasized that the group will “prioritize the most readily provable and meritorious complaints,” ensuring resources go where they’re most effective. For ordinary Americans, this means a stronger check on waste and abuse in programs like Medicare and Medicaid, with the potential for better care and less government spending lost to fraud. There’s also big news for whistleblowers. The DOJ’s Antitrust Division, in partnership with the U.S. Postal Service, has started offering financial rewards to people who report antitrust violations affecting the Postal Service. This expands the array of whistleblower incentives, including potential non-prosecution agreements and civil rewards, and encourages more citizens and employees to come forward with tips about fraud and abuses that hurt consumers, taxpayers, and competition. Looking ahead, companies should immediately review and update their data security policies, conduct compliance audits, and consult the DOJ’s published FAQs for guidance. Cit This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

DOJ's New Priorities: Denaturalization, White-Collar Enforcement, and Data Security [140 characters] Jul 09, 2025

Show notes

Thanks for joining us today for your Justice Department update, where we break down the week’s most impactful headlines and what they mean for you. Leading the news, the Department of Justice has announced an aggressive new policy prioritizing the revocation of U.S. citizenship for certain naturalized citizens convicted of serious crimes. This shift, outlined in a June memo, directs attorneys to make denaturalization one of their top five enforcement priorities, especially for cases involving national security or egregious offenses. Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate emphasized, “The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.” Since the announcement, at least one individual has already had their citizenship revoked, reigniting debates about due process and the historical use of this power. For the millions of naturalized Americans—roughly 25 million, according to recent data—this policy brings both anxiety and important reminders about the legal responsibilities tied to citizenship. Civil rights organizations are watching closely, questioning whether this could discourage immigrant participation in civic life or create a chilling effect for those seeking naturalization. Shifting gears, the DOJ made headlines with sweeping updates to its white-collar crime enforcement playbook. In a May 12 policy memo, Criminal Division head Matthew Galeotti noted a recalibrated approach focused on “striking an appropriate balance” between rooting out corporate wrongdoing and minimizing burdens on legitimate businesses. The memo sets out three core tenets: focus, fairness, and efficiency. For businesses, this means more incentives to self-disclose wrongdoing and cooperate, along with streamlined investigations. However, experts point out that companies need to carefully navigate compliance with these new policies to avoid heavy-handed penalties. On the regulatory front, the DOJ issued its 2025 Final Rule, effective July 8, to prohibit bulk data transactions with countries deemed national security risks. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche stated, “If you’re a foreign adversary, why would you go through the trouble of complicated cyber intrusions…when you can just buy [Americans’ data] on the open market?” The new rule aims to make unauthorized access to Americans’ sensitive information much harder, impacting data brokers, tech firms, and financial institutions. Businesses working with international partners are advised to review compliance protocols and prepare for DOJ guidance and enforcement actions rolling out this summer. Meanwhile, in a major push for healthcare accountability, the DOJ and Health and Human Services have launched a joint False Claims Act working group, announced July 2. The initiative targets fraud in critical programs like Medicare and Medicaid, aiming to recoup taxpayer dollars and deter bad actors across healthcare and government c This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

DOJ's Data Privacy Push and Shift on DEI: New Enforcement Priorities Reshape Business Landscape Jul 09, 2025

Show notes

Listeners, the Department of Justice is making headlines this week with the announcement of sweeping new enforcement priorities and initiatives, touching everything from data privacy to corporate accountability. At the top of the news: the DOJ’s Civil Division has issued a directive to target what it calls “illegal” diversity, equity, and inclusion—or DEI—programs in the private sector, especially those of federal contractors and entities receiving federal funds. This marks a sharp shift, with the administration signaling a presumption that most DEI-related policies may run afoul of anti-discrimination laws. The DOJ is prepared to use the False Claims Act as a key enforcement tool, signaling a potentially significant increase in litigation and regulatory oversight for businesses engaged in DEI initiatives. The department’s memo, referencing President Trump’s executive order on “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” puts organizations on notice that affirmative litigation is a central enforcement strategy moving forward. Meanwhile, July 8 marks the start of enforcement for the DOJ’s 2025 Final Rule on bulk data transfers, a major national security measure. This rule, rooted in an executive order from February 2024, prohibits and restricts transactions involving Americans’ sensitive personal data with countries deemed national security threats. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche underscored the urgency: “If you’re a foreign adversary, why would you go through the trouble of complicated cyber intrusions and theft to get Americans’ data when you can just buy it on the open market or force a company under your jurisdiction to give you access? The Data Security Program makes getting that data a lot harder.” This rule requires U.S. businesses—especially those handling bulk consumer or government data—to overhaul compliance processes immediately, and state and local governments are expected to shore up their own data-sharing safeguards. In the area of health care fraud and government programs, the DOJ, alongside the Department of Health and Human Services, has relaunched its False Claims Act Working Group. The renewal underscores a continued commitment to pursuing fraud, waste, and abuse in government programs, focusing on protecting taxpayer dollars in sectors like Medicare and Medicaid. Enforcement priorities also cover defense spending and financial fraud, with a directive to avoid unnecessarily burdening American businesses. According to the latest policy memo, three guiding principles—focus, fairness, and efficiency—will govern prosecutors’ approach, with a clear warning that overzealous enforcement that stifles legitimate business risk-taking should be avoided. Businesses and organizations should brace for heightened scrutiny of compliance programs and consider reviewing their DEI and data governance strategies. State and local governments will see increased federal involvement, especially in areas of public dat This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

"DOJ Shakes Up Antitrust, White-Collar Enforcement, and Immigration Fines: A Policy Roundup" Jun 30, 2025

Show notes

The biggest headline out of the Department of Justice this week is the landmark settlement in the tech industry: the DOJ has just announced it will allow Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s acquisition of Juniper Networks to move forward, but only after securing tough divestitures and licensing commitments from both companies. DOJ officials, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, declared that this novel approach is intended not just to enforce the law but to find “creative solutions that protect competition while still allowing opportunity for innovation.” This decision lands as the tech sector faces growing scrutiny about mergers that could curb competition and drive up prices for Americans. Shifting from antitrust to enforcement policy, May brought significant changes to how the DOJ prosecutes corporate white-collar crime. Matthew Galeotti, head of the DOJ’s Criminal Division, unveiled a new White-Collar Enforcement Plan, emphasizing incentives for companies to self-report wrongdoing. If a company proactively discloses a violation and cooperates fully, it is now guaranteed declination or, in some cases, a 75% reduction in fines and no compliance monitor. Galeotti explained, “Self-disclosure is the key—companies stepping up, telling the truth, and fixing the problem will see tangible benefits.” These changes specifically target high-impact crime areas—health care fraud, customs violations, and elder securities fraud—prioritizing threats that hit American wallets and our government directly. In a move likely to impact millions, the DOJ and Department of Homeland Security just finalized a streamlined rule for issuing fines to undocumented immigrants. By eliminating the previous 30-day notice period and authorizing fines to be sent by regular mail, authorities claim this will close enforcement loopholes and deter illegal entry. Fines range from $100 per entry to nearly $10,000 for failing to depart after a judge’s order. According to DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, “The law doesn’t enforce itself. There must be consequences for breaking it.” Meanwhile, DOJ budget cuts earlier this spring continue to ripple through grant programs. Amy Solomon with the Council on Criminal Justice reports that some grants have been reinstated after public outcry, but uncertainty remains about future funding for state and local safety programs. The White House is expected to release further details in the coming weeks, with new grant opportunities anticipated as agencies set their FY 2025 priorities. What does all this mean for Americans? For citizens and businesses, it may mean more predictable enforcement and a chance for companies to right wrongs without crippling penalties. For local governments, especially those relying on justice grants, there’s anxiety over possible funding gaps. Internationally, stepped-up enforcement of trade and customs fraud shows the US is doubling down on protecting its financial system. Looking ahead, listeners should watch for upco This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

DOJ Shifts Priorities: Balancing Corporate Oversight and Innovation Jun 27, 2025

Show notes

This week, the Department of Justice grabbed headlines as a Michigan doctor was sentenced to four years in prison for leading a $6.3 million Medicare fraud scheme, according to the latest Justice Department press release. Meanwhile, in a separate case, a Mexican national received more than eight years for laundering $5.5 million, spotlighting the DOJ's continued crackdown on financial crimes and health care fraud. Turning to policy, recent updates show the DOJ is shifting its approach to white collar crime. In May, the Criminal Division issued a memo outlining new investigative and prosecution priorities, aiming to "strike an appropriate balance" between rooting out corruption and avoiding unnecessary burdens on American businesses. The memo, spearheaded by Criminal Division head Matthew Galeotti, urges prosecutors to focus on high-impact areas, act fairly—especially by considering alternatives to prosecution for companies that cooperate—and to proceed efficiently by moving cases forward quickly and only imposing outside monitors when truly necessary. According to analysis from legal experts at Mayer Brown and others, this marks a notable pivot in how the department plans to tackle corporate wrongdoing, signaling a desire to support innovation and enterprise while still safeguarding the public interest. On the enforcement front, new developments include the Civil Division’s announcement of five key priorities, including heightened scrutiny on health care fraud, with the FBI recently calling on the public to report suspicious hospital or clinic activity. The Justice Department has also ramped up investigations into alleged discrimination, most notably notifying the University of California that it believes some faculty hiring practices may violate civil rights law by favoring certain racial or gender groups. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon wrote that ambitious diversity goals outlined in the UC 2030 Capacity Plan could have "precipitated unlawful action" by the university. In response, higher education leaders defend their diversity initiatives, arguing they are vital for equal opportunity and student success, while legal analysts suggest this move could signal broader federal scrutiny of employer diversity efforts nationwide. Looking beyond domestic issues, this week saw renewed controversy over the Justice Department’s role in immigration policy. Groups including Democracy Forward, the ACLU Foundation of Texas, and the National Immigration Law Center have filed a motion alleging collusion between the Trump administration and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to eliminate the Texas Dream Act, which provides in-state tuition for undocumented students. The filing claims this undermines the legal system and threatens protections for thousands of students. These developments ripple through communities—affecting businesses navigating new enforcement policies, local governments facing increased federal oversight, and fa This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

DOJ's Crackdown on Cartels, Civil Rights Violations, and White Collar Crime Jun 21, 2025

Show notes

The most significant headline out of the Department of Justice this week: a high-ranking member of a violent Mexican drug cartel has been sentenced to 35 years in prison for orchestrating an international drug trafficking conspiracy. This marks a major milestone in the DOJ’s ongoing efforts to disrupt transnational criminal organizations and safeguard American communities. Attorney General Lisa Monaco praised the outcome, stating, “This conviction sends a clear message: we will pursue and dismantle criminal networks wherever they operate.” Beyond enforcement, the DOJ has unveiled a series of new priorities aimed at both strengthening civil rights protections and reshaping how white collar crime is prosecuted. Just days ago, Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate issued a directive reinforcing the Civil Division’s commitment to using the False Claims Act—traditionally an anti-fraud tool—to aggressively pursue entities that receive federal funds but knowingly violate civil rights laws, including universities and federal contractors. This builds on Executive Order 14173, which directs federal agencies to root out illegal discrimination and restore merit-based opportunity, with a focus on combating antisemitism and other forms of bias. The ambitious Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, announced in May, is the clearest signal yet that the DOJ is putting serious investigative weight behind these issues. For businesses and organizations, the Criminal Division’s latest policy shift is just as significant. Outlined in a memo by Division head Matthew R. Galeotti, the DOJ is balancing a crackdown on white collar crime with efforts to avoid “overreach that punishes risk-taking and hinders innovation.” This means a renewed focus on the most urgent threats—think financial fraud and corporate misconduct—with incentives for companies to self-report wrongdoing and cooperate early. Galeotti emphasized, “Our approach ensures accountability while minimizing unnecessary burdens on American enterprise.” Companies are advised to review their compliance programs, as the DOJ has signaled it will reserve heavy-handed interventions for only the most egregious cases. For state and local governments, the DOJ’s priorities could mean closer federal scrutiny of civil rights enforcement and potentially more federal prosecution of crimes where local policies are seen as inadequate. According to recent reports, initiatives like Project 2025 may expand federal law enforcement’s presence in jurisdictions facing ongoing crime challenges and even allow for DOJ intervention when local officials are perceived to not uphold the rule of law. This could reshape the federal-local dynamic and put pressure on local prosecutors to align with federal priorities. Internationally, partnerships remain front and center, as seen in the high-profile cartel prosecution. The DOJ continues to work closely with foreign law enforcement to tackle cross-border threats, aiming to disrupt the flow of illicit This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

Our TOPPODCAST Picks

Follow Us

Stay Connected

Department of Justice (DOJ) News

Related Podcasts

Links

Stay Connected