TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Democracy in Question?

    Today, liberal democracies are under unprecedented strain from within and without. In each episode, renowned social anthropologist Shalini Randeria invites a leading scholar to explore the challenges and dilemmas facing democracies around the world. They investigate what needs to be done to ensure the future well-being of our democratic institutions and practices.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © Graduate Institute Geneva - 2021

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    The Genealogy of Illiberalism Mar 02, 2022
    Show notes

    Guests featured in this episode:

    Renata Uitz, is the co-editor of Handbook of Illiberalism, who has contributed two chapters to it as well. Renata is also professor of Comparative Constitutional Law at the Central European University, Vienna, as well as the co-director of its Democracy Institute in Budapest.

    Helena Rosenblatt is a professor of history, French, and political theory at the Graduate Center of The City University of New York, and the author of both Liberal Values: Benjamin Constant and the Politics of Religion andThe Lost History of Liberalism: From Ancient Rome to the Twenty-First Century. Helena has also submitted an article on “The History of Illiberalism” in the Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (2022).

    Glossary

    What was the Reign of Terror?
    (pg. 2 of the transcript or 00:7:58)

    The Reign of Terror (June 1793 – July 1794) was a period in the French revolution characterized by brutal repression. The Terror originated with a centralized political regime that suspended most of the democratic achievements of the revolution, and intended to pursue the revolution on social matters. Its stated aim was to destroy internal enemies and conspirators and to chase the external enemies from French territory.The Terror as such started on September 5, 1793 and, as the Reign of Terror, lasted until the summer of 1794, taking the lives of anywhere between 18,000 to 40,000 people (estimates vary widely). Thousands would die by means of the guillotine, including many of the greatest lights of the revolution, like Georges Danton.. The deaths can be explained in part by the sense of emergency that gripped the revolutionary leadership as the country teetered on the brink of civil war. Source

    Who was John Stuart Mill?
    (pg. 3 of the transcript or 00:12:19)

    John Stuart Mill, an English philosopher, economist, and exponent of utilitarianism. He was prominent as a publicist in the reforming age of the 19th century, and remains of lasting interest as a logician and an ethical theorist.The influence that his works exercised upon contemporary English thought can scarcely be overestimated, nor can there be any doubt about the value of the liberal and inquiring spirit with which he handled the great questions of his time. Beyond that, however, there has been considerable difference of opinion about the enduring merits of his philosophy. Source

    Who was Alexis de Tocqueville?
    (pg. 3 of the transcript or 00:12:27)

    Alexis de Tocqueville, French sociologist, political scientist, historian, and politician, best known for Democracy in America (1835–40). Tocqueville traveled to the United States in 1831 to study its prisons and returned with a wealth of broader observations that he codified in “Democracy in America”, one of the most influential books of the 19th century. With its trenchant observations on equality and individualism, Tocqueville’s work remains a valuable explanation of America to Europeans and of Americans to themselves. Tocqueville’s works shaped 19th-century discussions of liberalism and equality, and were rediscovered in the 20th century as sociologists debated the causes and cures of tyranny. Source

    What does cancel culture mean?
    (pg. 6 of the transcript or 00:32:27)

    Cancel culture refers to the popular practice of withdrawing support for (canceling) public figures and companies after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive. Cancel culture is generally discussed as being performed on social media in the form of group shaming. Source

    Democracy in Question? is brought to you by:

    • Central European University: CEU

    • The Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: AHCD

    • The Podcast Company: Novel


    Freedom of Expression in an Unequal World Feb 09, 2022
    Show notes

    Guests featured in this episode:

    Irene Khan, the first woman to ever hold the mandate of UN Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Opinion and Expression.

    She is also a Distinguished Fellow and Research Associate at the Graduate Institute's Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy.

    Previously, Irene Khan was Secretary-General of Amnesty International (2001-2009) and Director-General of the International Development Law Organization (2010 to 2019).

    Democracy in Question? is brought to you by:

    • Central European University: CEU

    • The Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: AHCD

    • The Podcast Company: Novel

    Glossary for this episode...

    Who is Maria Ressa?
    (00:5:22 or p.2 in the transcript)

    Maria Ressa, in full Maria Angelita Ressa, Filipino-American journalist who, through Rappler, the Manila-based digital media company for investigative journalism that she cofounded, became known for detailing the weaponization of social media and for exposing government corruption and human rights violations. Her reporting led to a backlash from the Philippine government, and Ressa, who holds dual citizenship, became an international symbol of the fight for freedom of the press in hostile circumstances. With Russian journalist Dmitry Muratov, she was awarded the 2021Nobel Peace Prize, cited for using “freedom of expression to expose abuse of power, use of violence, and growing authoritarianism in her native country.” Source

    What was the insurrection of Capitol Hill in 2021?
    (00:6:02 or p.2 in the transcript)

    United States Capitol attack of 2021, storming of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, by a mob of supporters of Republican President Donald J. Trump. The attack disrupted a joint session of Congress convened to certify the results of the presidential election of 2020, which Trump had lost to his Democratic opponent, Joe Biden. Because its object was to prevent a legitimate president-elect from assuming office, the attack was widely regarded as an insurrection or attempted coup d’état. The FBI and other law-enforcement agencies also considered it an act of domestic terrorism. For having given a speech before the attack in which he encouraged a large crowd of his supporters near the White House to march to the Capitol and violently resist Congress’s certification of Biden’s victory—which many in the crowd then did—Trump was impeached by the Democratic-led House of Representatives for “incitement of insurrection” (he was subsequently acquitted by the Senate). Source

    What is the Facebook Oversight Board?
    (00:18:49 or p.4 in the transcript)

    The Oversight Board was created to help Facebook answer some of the most difficult questions around freedom of expression online: what to take down, what to leave up, and why.

    The board uses its independent judgment to support people’s right to free expression and ensure those rights are being adequately respected. The board’s decisions to uphold or reverse Facebook’s content decisions will be binding, meaning Facebook will have to implement them, unless doing so could violate the law.

    The purpose of the board is to promote free expression by making principled, independent decisions regarding content on Facebook and Instagram and by issuing recommendations on the relevant Facebook company content policy.

    When fully staffed, the board will consist of 40 members from around the world that represent a diverse set of disciplines and backgrounds. These members will be empowered to select content cases for review and to uphold or reverse Facebook’s content decisions. The board is not designed to be a simple extension of Facebook’s existing content review process. Rather, it will review a select number of highly emblematic cases and determine if decisions were made in accordance with Facebook’s stated values and policies. Source

    What is a platform law?
    (00:21:06 or p.5 in the transcript)

    The internet would seem to be an ideal platform for fostering norm diversity. The very structure of the internet resists centralized governance, while the opportunities it provides for the “long tail” of expression means even voices with extremely small audiences can find a home. In reality, however, the governance of online speech looks much more monolithic. This is largely a result of private “lawmaking” activity by internet intermediaries. Increasingly, social media companies like Facebook and Twitter are developing what David Kaye, UN Special Rapporteur for the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, has called “platform law.” Through a combination of community standards, contract, technological design, and case-specific practice, social media companies are developing “Facebook law” and “Twitter law,” displacing the laws of national jurisdictions. Source


    Governance in Illiberal Democracies Jan 26, 2022
    Show notes

    Guests featured in this episode:

    Professor Andras Sajo, former judge at the European Court of Human Rights & founding Dean of Legal Studies Department at the Central European University,

    Democracy in Question? is brought to you by:

    • Central European University: CEU

    • The Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: AHCD

    • The Podcast Company: Novel

    Follow us on social media!

    • Central European University: @CEU

    • Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: @AHDCentre

    Subscribe to the show. If you enjoyed what you listened to, you can support us by leaving a review and sharing our podcast in your networks!

    Bibliography:

    1. Constitutional Topography: Values and Constitutions by Andras Sajo& Renata Uitz (editors) Eleven International Publishing, 2010
    2. Ruling by Cheating: Governance in Illiberal Democracy by Andras Sajo, Cambridge University Press, 2021
    3. Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law Michel Rosenfeld &Andras Sajo (editors) Oxford University Press, 2013

    Glossary:

    What is Max Weber’s view on charismatic leadership?
    (at 00:9:20 or pg. 2 in the transcript)

    In his essay “The Three Types of Legitimate Rule” published in 1958, the influential German sociologist Max Weber introduced his theory of authority which was based on tripartite classifications of authority: traditional authority, rational-legal authority and charismatic authority (also referred to as charismatic leadership or domination). According to Weber, order is based on two fundamental forms: norms and authority.

    Charismatic leadership, according to Weber, is found in a leader with extraordinary characteristics of individual, whose mission and vision inspire others. In such, this charismatic leader is seen as the head of any social or political movement, sometimes gifted with divine powers such as: religious prophets and Gurus. However, charismatic leadership is considered unstable as it is related to faith and belief; once these fade, the authority and leadership dissolve.

    Thus, charismatic authority depends on the extent to which a religious or political figure is able to preserve moral influence and prosperity to his followers. Weber favoured charismatic leadership and saw its inevitable influence over the other two authorities with the use of soft power in both the traditional and legal-rational authorities. Source

    What is India’s Citizenship Amendment Act?
    (at 00:21:51 or pg. 5 in the transcript)

    In December 2019, the Indian Parliament passed the Citizenship Amendment Act 2019. The Act amended the law to fast-track citizenship for religious minorities, specifically Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians, from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who entered India prior to 2015. However, the Act does not extend to Muslim minorities, for example: the Ahmadiyya from Pakistan; the Rohingya from Myanmar; and the Tamil from Sri Lanka. Opponents of the Act have claimed that it is unconstitutional as it links citizenship to religion and marginalises India’s Muslim population. However, the Government has argued that the law protects religious minorities.

    The Act has been referred to the Indian Supreme Court. In January 2020, the Court said it would not put the implementation of the law on hold but asked the Government to respond to the petitions challenging the law’s constitutional validity within a month.

    Some Indian states have announced that they will not implement the law. However, the Government has stated that states have a “constitutional duty” to do so.

    The Act has led to widespread protests, with activists and human rights organisations, such as Amnesty International, criticising the police and the Government for the response. Source

    What is the concept of constitutional patriotism?
    (at 00:23:02 or pg. 5 in the transcript)

    The purpose of constitutional patriotism, -Jürgen Habermas's well-known theory- as a set of beliefs and dispositions, is to enable and uphold a liberal democratic form of rule that free and equal citizens can justify to each other. The object of patriotic attachment is a specific constitutional culture that mediates between the universal and the particular, while the mode of attachment is one of critical judgment. Finally, constitutional patriotism results in a number of policy recommendations that are clearly different from policies that liberal nationalists would advocate. Source

    Who was Gustav Radbruch?
    (at 00:27:30 or pg. 6 in the transcript)

    Gustav Radbruch, German jurist and legal philosopher, one of the foremost exponents of legal relativism and legal positivism. He also served the Weimar government as a Minister of Justice (1921–22; 1923). Radbruch’s legal philosophy grew out of the neo-Kantian principle that law is defined by and depends upon moral values. In such a system, there are no absolutes; thus, the concepts of right and justice are not absolute but are relative to time and place and to the values of the parties in a given legal proceeding. As a result of Nazi rule in Germany, however, a radical change in Radbruch’s outlook occurred in his later years. He abandoned relativism and turned toward a philosophy of natural law that recognized certain absolute, innate properties of law and justice. Source


    Holding Power Accountable with Investigative Journalism Jan 12, 2022
    Show notes

    Democracy in Question? is brought to you by:

    • Central European University: CEU

    • The Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: AHCD

    • The Podcast Company: Novel

    Follow us on social media!

    • Central European University: @CEU

    • Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: @AHDCentre

    Subscribe to the show. If you enjoyed what you listened to, you can support us by leaving a review and sharing our podcast in your networks!

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    The Watchdog That Didn't Bark: The Financial Crisis and the Disappearance of Investigative Journalism (Columbia University Press, 2014).

    GLOSSARY

    What is ICIJ?
    (00:0:45 or p.1 in the transcript)

    The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), is a U.S.-based nonprofit organization - which is both a small, resourceful newsroom with our own reporting team, as well as a global network of reporters and media organizations who work together to investigate the most important stories in the world. ICIJ encompasses 280 of the best investigative reporters from more than 100 countries and territories and is partner with more than 100 media organizations from the world’s most renowned outlets, including the BBC, the New York Times, the Guardian to small regional nonprofit investigative centers to collaborate on groundbreaking investigations that expose the truth and hold the powerful accountable, aligning the highest professional standards, fairness and accuracy. Source.

    What are the Pandora Papers?
    (00:0:50 or p.1 in the transcript)

    The Pandora Papers is a collection of millions of leaked documents published by ICIJ in 2021 and the biggest journalism partnership in history, which have uncovered financial secrets of 35 current and former world leaders, more than 330 politicians and public officials in 91 countries and territories.

    The investigation unmasks the covert owners of offshore companies, incognito bank accounts, private jets, yachts, mansions, even artworks– providing more information than what’s usually available to law enforcement agencies and cash-strapped governments and reveal the inner workings of a shadow economy that benefits the wealthy and well-connected at the expense of everyone else. Source.

    What is the Enablers Act ?
    (00:14:04 or p.3 in the transcript)

    The Enablers Act (Establishing New Authorities for Business Laundering and Enabling Risks to Security (Enablers) Act) was a bipartisan bill proposed in the wake of the Pandora Papers. Legislation would require the treasury department to create new due-diligence rules for American middlemen who facilitate the flow of foreign assets into the United States. The act would update the 51-year-old Bank Secrecy Act, which requires banks to investigate their clients and the source of their wealth but had excluded trust companies, accountants, lawyers and other professionals. Source

    What is the Heritage Foundation?
    (00:19:03 or p.4 in the transcript)

    Heritage Foundation, U.S. conservative public policy research organization, or think tank based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is “to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.” Founded in 1973 by two Congressional aides, Edwin Feulner and Paul Weyrich, it provides research on pending political issues to Congress, policymakers, news media, and academic communities. The foundation flourished during the presidency of Ronald Reagan (1981–89), who used its handbook Mandate for Leadership: Principles to Limit Government, Expand Freedom, and Strengthen America to provide guidance for his administration. Source.

    What is the Brookings Institution?
    (00:19:05 or p.4 in the transcript)

    Brookings Institution, not-for-profit research organization based in Washington, D.C. founded in 1916 as the Institute for Government Research by the merchant, manufacturer, and philanthropist Robert S. Brookings and other reformers. In 1927 it merged with two other institutions established by Brookings, the Institute of Economics (1922) and the Robert S. Brookings Graduate School of Economics and Government (1924), to form the Brookings Institution. Devoted to public service through research and education in the social sciences, particularly in economics, government and foreign policy is one of the most influential think tanks in the US. Source.


    Populism and democracy’s ‘critical infrastructure Dec 08, 2021
    Show notes

    Glossary for DiQ ep 7 series 3 – Jan Werner Müller

    Who was Alexis de Tocqueville?
    (pg. 1 tocquevillian question of the transcript or 00:1:08)

    French sociologist and political theorist Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859) traveled to the United States in 1831 to study its prisons and returned with a wealth of broader observations that he codified in “Democracy in America” (1835), one of the most influential books of the 19th century. With its trenchant observations on equality and individualism, Tocqueville’s work remains a valuable explanation of America to Europeans and of Americans to themselves.

    What is nativism?
    (pg. 1 of the transcript or 00:4:42)

    Nativism represents the political idea that people who were born in a country are more important than immigrants. Source.

    Who is Marine Le Pen?

    (pg. 3 of the transcript or 00:10:03)

    Marine Le Pen, French politician who succeeded her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen, as leader of the National Front (later National Rally) party in 2011. She was that party’s candidate in the 2017 French presidential election. In 1998 she joined the administrative apparatus of the National Front, which had been founded by her father in 1972 and was the main right-wing opposition to France’s mainstream conservative parties. She served as the director of the party’s legal affairs until 2003, when she became the National Front’s vice president. The following year she made a successful run for a seat in the European Parliament where she joined her father in that body’s nonaligned bloc. As Le Pen emerged from her father’s shadow to become a national figure in her own right, she distanced herself from some of his and the party’s more extreme views. While she embraced the National Front’s established anti-immigration stance, she rebranded the party’s traditional Euroscepticism as French nationalism and she was a vocal critic of the anti- Semitism that has marginalized the party in the past.

    In June 2018 Le Pen announced that the National Front would change its name to Rassemblement National (National Rally), in an apparent effort to distance the party from its overtly neofascist and anti-Semitic past. The National Rally topped the field in EU parliamentary elections in 2019, and opinion polling indicated that they were likely to carry that momentum into French regional elections in 2021. The party performed far below expectations in the first round of balloting, however, in an election that was characterized by extremely low voter turnout. Source

    What was the Fairness Doctrine?
    (Page 6 of the transcript or 00:25:14)

    U.S. communications policy (1949–87) formulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Required licensed radio and television broadcasters to present fair and balanced coverage of controversial issues of interest to their communities, including by granting equal airtime to opposing candidates for public office. The fairness doctrine was never without its opponents, however, many of whom perceived the equal airtime requirement as an infringement of the right to freedom of speech enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution.

    In 1987 the FCC formally repealed the fairness doctrine but maintained both the editorial and personal-attack provisions, which remained in effect until 2000. In addition, until they were finally repealed by the commission in 2011, more than 80 media rules maintained language that implemented the doctrine. Source

    Who was John Dewey?
    (page 7 of the transcript or 00:28:02)

    John Dewey (1859–1952) was one of American pragmatism’s early founders, along with Charles Sanders Peirce and William James, and arguably the most prominent American intellectual for the first half of the twentieth century. Dewey’s educational theories and experiments had a global reach, his psychological theories had a sizeable influence in that growing science, and his writings about democratic theory and practice deeply influenced debates in academic and practical quarters for decades.

    Dewey also developed extensive and often systematic views in ethics, epistemology, logic, metaphysics, aesthetics, and philosophy of religion. In addition to academic life, Dewey comfortably wore the mantle of public intellectual, infusing public issues with lessons found through philosophy.

    He spoke on topics of broad moral significance, such as human freedom, economic alienation, race relations, women’s suffrage, war and peace, human freedom, and educational goals and methods. Typically, discoveries made via public inquiries were integrated back into his academic theories, and aided their revision. This practice-theory-practice rhythm powered every area of Dewey’s intellectual enterprise, and perhaps explains why his philosophical theories are still discussed, criticized, adapted, and deployed in many academic and practical arenas. Source

    Who is Elizabeth Anderson?
    (page 7 of the transcript or 00:30:40)

    American Philosopher specializing in moral, social and political philosophy, feminist theory, social epistemology, and the philosophy of economics and the social sciences. She is particularly interested in exploring the interactions of social science with moral and political theory, how we learn to improve our value judgments, the epistemic functions of emotions and democratic deliberation, and issues of race, gender, and equality. Source


    The Right to Belong Nov 24, 2021
    Show notes

    Glossary

    Who is Hannah Arendt?

    (00: 2: 08 or page 1)

    Hannah Arendt (1906–1975) was one of the most influential political philosophers of the twentieth

    century. Born into a German-Jewish family, she was forced to leave Germany in 1933 and lived in

    Paris for the next eight years, working for a number of Jewish refugee organisations. In 1941 she

    immigrated to the United States and soon became part of a lively intellectual circle in New York. She

    held a number of academic positions at various American universities until her death in 1975. She is

    best known for two works that had a major impact both within and outside the academic

    community. The first, The Origins of Totalitarianism, published in 1951, was a study of the Nazi and

    Stalinist regimes that generated a wide-ranging debate on the nature and historical antecedents of

    the totalitarian phenomenon. Source

    Who are the Chakma refugees?

    (00:6:41 or page 2)

    The Chakmas are ethnic people who lived in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, most of which are

    located in Bangladesh. Chakmas are predominantly Buddhists, they are found in northeast

    India, West Bengal, Bangladesh, and Myanmar.The Chakmas living in India are Indian citizens,

    some of them, mostly from Mizoram, live in relief camps in southern Tripura due to tribal

    conflict with Mizos. Source

    What is the 1951 Convention?

    (00:25:25 or page 5)

    The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, as complemented by its 1967 Protocol, has

    justly been termed the “Magna Carta” of refugees. The Convention and Protocol are, indeed, the

    culmination of an uninterrupted effort by the international community, started under the League of

    Nations in 1921, to ensure the international recognition of some basic rights and of certain minimum

    standards of treatment for persons forced to flee their country in order to escape persecution on

    account of their race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership of a particular social

    group. The fundamental importance of the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol was stressed by the

    World Conference on Human Rights held in Vienna in 1993, and has been repeatedly affirmed by the

    General Assembly of the United Nations, which has hailed the Convention and Protocol as “the

    cornerstone of the international system for the protection of refugees”.The Executive Committee of

    UNHCR has also emphasised the primacy of these instruments, and confirmed that they form the

    international legal basis for the protection of refugees. Source


    The Role of Radio in Transitions to Democracy Nov 10, 2021
    Show notes

    The episode explores the role of locally embedded news and media organizations in facilitating citizen participation in societies seeking to further democracy. In the age of misinformation, can the patient and steady pace of radio journalism prove to be a much-needed democratic corrective? In the discussion, Caroline Vuillemine and Said Nazir examine the role of the radio and the opportunities facing this medium of public communication.

    Democracy in Question? is brought to you by:

    • Central European University: CEU

    • The Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: AHCD

    • The Podcast Company: Novel

    Follow us on social media!

    • Central European University: @CEU

    • Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: @AHDCentre

    Subscribe to the show. If you enjoyed what you listened to, you can support us by leaving a review and sharing our podcast in your networks!

    GLOSSARY

    Glossary for episode 5 Caroline & Said

    What is Fondation Hirondelle?

    (00:1:03 or p.1 in the transcript)

    Fondation Hirondelle is a Swiss non-profit organization which provides information to populations

    faced with crisis, empowering them in their daily lives and as citizens. Founded in 1995 and based in

    Lausanne, Fondation Hirondelle currently implements media programmes in 8 countries in Africa

    and Asia.Through our work, millions of people in war-affected countries, post-conflict areas,

    humanitarian crises, and societies in democratic transition have access to media that speak to them

    and give them a voice.Fondation Hirondelle practices and defends responsible, independent,

    accurate journalism in conflict and post-conflict situations, in humanitarian crises and countries in

    democratic transition. Our information covers the news in the countries and regions where we work,

    as well as key issues that connect societies.Our debate programs bring together all political and

    social components of society. They facilitate the participation of ordinary people in public debate,

    and create a platform where everyone has a voice and people can seek common solutions to

    problems. Source

    What is TNN?

    (00:1:22 or p.1 in the transcript)

    Founded by broadcast journalists, TNN provides balanced and accurate news coverage of events

    particularly in KP and tribal districts providing local people with local news and information that

    affect their social and political lives.TNN has just become digital-first where it reports first for online

    audience and then reversions those stories for 10 partner FM radio stations in the region.

    TNN was established to serve radio audiences through partner FM radio stations in 2014, but with

    the passage of time it has evolved itself as an online multimedia news organization catering to the

    needs of online audience in the Pakhtun areas. TNN also produces and broadcasts telephonic

    bulletins in Pashto since September 2016 that provide latest stories to unique audience of 100,000

    that are registered with TNN. The news can be heard by dialing a local number from mobile phone.

    TNN also produces daily five-minute long radio bulletins in Pashto on the most important news

    events for broadcast by a network of 10 partner radio stations across KP and tribal districts. News

    stories, features and interviews are also published on the TNN website in Pashto, Urdu and English

    to tell national and international audiences about events in our region. TNN also accommodates

    news and views of interest to Pakhtun audience in other parts of Pakistan and also in Afghanistan.

    Source:


    Biopolitics from Below Oct 27, 2021
    Show notes

    This episode explores with Ranabir Samaddar the specific nature of democratic politics during the COVID-19 crisis. Anchored in the specificity of the experience of the pandemic in India, the episode also addresses the global transformation of politics in a time of crisis. How has the pandemic changed our understanding of politics? What does it mean to refocus on life as the primary object of politics? And what does the COVID-19 crisis reveal about the nature of the contemporary Indian state and the fundamental concepts of sovereignty and citizenship?

    Democracy in Question? is brought to you by:

    • Central European University: CEU

    • The Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: AHCD

    • The Podcast Company: Novel

    Follow us on social media!

    • Central European University: @CEU

    • Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: @AHDCentre

    Subscribe to the show. If you enjoyed what you listened to, you can support us by leaving a review and sharing our podcast in your networks!

    Bibliograpy:

    Samaddar, R (2017). Karl Marx and the Postcolonial Age. Calcutta: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Samaddar, R (2007). The Materiality of Politics: The Technologies of Rule Volume 1. London: Anthem Press.

    Samaddar, R et al (2022) India’s Migrant Workers and the Pandemic. New York: Routledge.

    Grebmer, Klaus von, Jill Bernstein et al (2021). Global Hunger Index: Hunger and Food systems in conflict settings: Bonn / Dublin.

    Agamben, Giorgio (1998). Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. California: Stanford University Press.

    Glossary:
    What is Global Hunger Index?
    (00:2:17 or p.1 in the transcript)

    The Global Hunger Index is a peer-reviewed annual report, jointly published by Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe, designed to comprehensively measure and track hunger at the global, regional, and country levels. The aim of the GHI is to trigger action to reduce hunger around the world. Source:

    Who is Foucault and what does biopolitics mean?
    (00:3:36 or p.1 in the transcript)

    Foucault and biopolitics: Michel Foucault was a major figure in two successive waves of 20th century French thought–the structuralist wave of the 1960s and then the poststructuralist wave. Foucault’s work is transdisciplinary in nature, ranging across the concerns of the disciplines of history, sociology, psychology, and philosophy. At the first decade of the 21st century, Foucault is the author most frequently cited in the humanities in general. The concept of biopolitics was first outlined by Michel Foucault (2003, 2007, 2009) in his lectures at the Collège de France in order to name and analyze emergent logics of power in the 18th and 19th centuries. According to Foucault, biopolitics refers to the processes by which human life, at the level of the population, emerged as a distinct political problem in Western societies. Biopolitics refers to the style of government that regulates populations through "biopower" - the application and impact of poitical power on all aspects of human life. Source:

    What is Malthusianism?
    (00:12:23 or p.3 in the transcript)

    Malthusianism: Thomas Malthus, English economist and demographer who is best known for his theory that population growth will always tend to outrun the food supply and that betterment of humankind is impossible without stern limits on reproduction. This thinking is commonly referred to as Malthusianism. Source:

    What was the Great Deccan famine?
    (00:12:33 or p.3 in the transcript)

    The 1630–1632 famine was the worst that occurred during the Mughal Empire in India. It was caused by a severe drought, followed by a huge flood and a plague of locusts. During that same period, the Ganges in East India changed its river bed, which led to bad harvests in the following years. Source:


    Challenges of the Israeli democracy today Oct 13, 2021
    Show notes

    The episode explores with Avrum Burg the challenges with which the Israeli democracy is confronted. As Israel stands at the crossroads after the defeat of its longest serving Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with his expansionist politics, which have marked the country's territorial expansion over the last decades, this episode asks: Will the new eight party coalition government mark the beginnings of a fight against the radicalization of the Israeli state and society?

    And what are the long-term effects of this radicalization, not just for the Israeli democracy itself, but also for the rights of Arab and Palestinian people in the region? Can democracy survive in Israel when the Arab minority is denied its legitimate claims to equal citizenship in the country? And what is the relationship of religious sentiments, religious resurgence, with democratic politics?

    Democracy in Question? is brought to you by:

    • Central European University: CEU

    • The Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: AHCD

    • The Podcast Company: Novel

    Follow us on social media!

    • Central European University: @CEU

    • Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: @AHDCentre

    Subscribe to the show. If you enjoyed what you listened to, you can support us by leaving a review and sharing our podcast in your networks!

    Bibliography

    Burg, A (2018). In Days to Come["A New Hope for Israel"]. Israel: Nation Books

    Burg, A. (2016). The Holocaust Is Over; We Must Rise From Its Ashes. United

    States: St. Martin's Publishing Group.

    Burg, A (2012). Very Near to You: Human Readings of the Torah, Jerusalem,

    Israel: Gefen Pub House.

    Elkana, Yehuda (1988), ‘The Need to Forget’. Ha'aretz.

    Hirschman, A (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms,

    Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Glossary

    1. Jewish Agency (for Israel)

    The Jewish Agency since 1929 provides the global framework for Jewish people, ensures global Jewish safety, strengthens Jewish identity and connects Jews to Israel and one another. Source:

    1. Benjamin Netanyahu

    Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli politician and diplomat who served as Israel’s permanent representative to the United Nations in the ‘80s and twice as his country’s prime minister (1996–99 and 2009–21) and was the longest-serving prime minister since Israel’s independence. Source:

    1. Nation Law

    Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People informally known as the Nation-State Bill or the Nationality Bill, is an Israeli Basic Law largely symbolic and declarative in nature,passed by the Israeli Parliament (Knesset) on 19 July 2018. The legislation declares that Israel is the historic homeland of the Jewish people, and that “the right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people.” It establishes Hebrew as the official language of Israel and downgrades Arabic to a language with “special status”. The law also asserts that Jewish settlement—without specifying where—is a national value, and promises to encourage and advance settlement efforts. Source:

    1. Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT)

    The OPT consists of the West bank (including East Jerusalem) and Gaza. Israel occupied the West Bank and Gaza during the 1967 war. The launch of the 1993 Oslo peace process between Israel and the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization) led to the creation of the Palestinian Authority (PA). Source:

    1. Targeted prevention or targeted killings by the Israel Defence Forces (IDF):

    Targeted prevention occurred in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict against persons accused of carrying out or planning attacks on Israeli targets in the West Bank or inside Israel. Source:

    1. Yehuda Elkana (1934-2012)

    Yehuda Elkana was a historian and philosopher of science, the third President and Rector of Central European University (1999-2009), an Auschwitz survivor who became an international scholar and public intellectual with a deep commitment to open society. He was an academic pioneer, leading CEU for nearly half the life of the University. Source:

    1. Green Line

    Israel's territory according to the agreed 1949 Armistice Demarcation Line encompassed about 78% of the Mandate area, while the other parts, namely the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, were occupied by Jordan and Egypt respectively. The 1949 Armistice Lines between Israel and its Arab neighbors came to be known as The Green Line. Source:

    1. ’73 War

    Yom Kippur War, also called the October War, the Ramadan War, the Arab-Israeli war of October 1973, or the Fourth Arab-Israeli War, was initiated by Egypt and Syria on October 6, 1973, on the Jewish holy day of Yom kippur. It also occurred during Ramadan, the sacred month of fasting in Islam. The war was launched with the diplomatic aim of persuading Israel to negotiate on terms more favourable to the Arab countries. The Six-Day War in 1967, the previous Arab-Israeli war, in which Israel had captured and occupied Arab territories including the Sinai Peninsula and Golan Heights was followed by years of sporadic fighting. When Anwar Sadat became President of Egypt shortly after the War of Attrition (1969–70) ended, made overtures to reach a peaceful settlement if, Israel would return the territories it had captured. Israel rejected those terms, and the fighting developed into a full-scale war in 1973. Source:

    1. Peace with Egypt known as Camp David Accords

    Camp David Accords, agreements between Israel and Egypt signed on September 17, 1978, that led in the following year to a peace treaty between those two countries, the first such treaty between Israel and any of its Arab neighbours. Brokered by U.S. President Jimmy Carter between Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and officially titled the “Framework for Peace in the Middle East,” the agreements became known as the Camp David Accords because the negotiations took place at the U.S. presidential retreat at Camp David, Maryland. Sadat and Begin were awarded the Nobel Prize for Peace in 1978 for their contributions to the agreements. Source:

    1. Intifada

    Intifadah, (“shaking off”), either of two popular uprisings of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza aimed at ending Israel’s occupation of those territories and creating an independent Palestinian state. The first intifada began in December 1987 and ended in September 1993 with the signing of the first Oslo Accords which provided a framework for peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. The second intifada, sometimes called the Al-Aqṣā intifada, began in September 2000. Although no single event signaled its end, most analysts agree that it had run its course by late 2005. The two uprisings resulted in the death of more than 5,000 Palestinians and some 1,400 Israelis. Source:

    1. Oslo accords

    The Oslo Accords were a landmark moment in the pursuit of peace in the Middle East. A set of two separate agreements signed by the government of Israel and the leadership of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)—the militant organization established in 1964 to create a Palestinian state in the region—the Oslo Accords were ratified in Washington, D.C., in 1993 (Oslo I) and in Taba, Egypt, in 1995 (Oslo II). While provisions drafted during the talks remain in effect today, the relationship between the two sides continues to be marred by conflict. Source:


    Language and public discourse in the success of right-wing political movements Sep 29, 2021
    Show notes

    What is the nature of the linguistic and discursive repertoires of contemporary right-wing mobilizations in Europe? In this episode of Democracy in Question, presenter Shalini Randeria continues the conversation about the rise of radical right-wing political movements in recent years across the world with Ruth Wodak, Emeritus Distinguished Professor at Lancaster University, and visiting professor at CEU. Together they explore the role of language and public discourse in the scheme of things, asking how this increasingly vitiated public discourse promotes the cause of a politics based on fear.

    Democracy in Question? is brought to you by:

    • Central European University: CEU

    • The Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: AHCD

    • The Podcast Company: Novel


    Follow us on social media!

    • Central European University: @CEU

    • Albert Hirschman Centre on Democracy in Geneva: @AHDCentre

    Subscribe to the show. If you enjoyed what you listened to, you can support us by leaving a review and sharing our podcast in your networks!


    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean by Ruth Wodak (2015)

    Methods of Critical Discourse Studies by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (2015)

    The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics by Ruth Wodak and Bernhard Forchtner (2017)

    Österreichische Identitäten im Wandel:Empirische Untersuchungen zu ihrer diskursiven Konstruktion1995-2015 (German Edition) by Rudolf de Cillia, Ruth Wodak, Markus Rheindorf and Sabine Lehner (2020)

    The Politics of Fear: The shameless normalization of far-right populist discourses (Second Edition) by Ruth Wodak (2020)

    GLOSSARY

    What is “Right-wing Populist Perpetuum Mobile”?

    (00:3:56 or p.1 in the transcript)

    Theory that refers to the strong interdependence between media and parties, where media (and politicians) fall into the traps set by right-wing parties in the form of discursive strategies of provocation, exaggeration and scandalization, helping these parties to frame the agenda and appear on the front page in the news. Source

    Who was Jörg Haider?

    (00:4:02 or p.1 in the transcript)

    Controversial Austrian politician, a charismatic and a skillful orator, who served as leader of the far-right Freedom Party of Austria (1986–2000) and Alliance for the Future of Austria (2005–08) and as governor of the Bundesland (Federal State) of Kärnten (1989–91; 1999–2008).Haider virulently denounced immigration and opposed the expansion of the European Union to the east—positions that were applauded by a wide spectrum of Austrians. Particularly controversial were the number of statements he made about Hitler and the Nazis.  Source

    What is Austrian Freedom Party (Freiheitliche Partei Österreich or FPÖ)?

    (00:4:11 or p.1 in the transcript)

    The populist Freedom Party of Austria, sometimes referred to as the Liberal Party, was founded in 1955 as a successor to the League of Independents. Initially drawing the bulk of its support from former National Socialists, the party’s fiercely right-wing views had been largely moderated by the 1980s, and it participated in a coalition government with the SPÖ. In the late 1980s that ideological swing was reversed party leader Jörg Haider, who brought the FPÖ unprecedented electoral success with a Euroskeptic platform that capitalized on anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim sentiment. An internecine feud in 2005 caused Haider to leave the FPÖ and form a new party, the Alliance for the Future of Austria (Bündnis Zukunft Österreich; BZÖ). While the FPÖ remained a significant, if controversial, force in national politics in the 21st century, electoral support for the BZÖ declined greatly after Haider’s death in 2008. Source

    What is Fridays for Future?

    (00:24:30 or p.4 in the transcript)

    Fridays for Future (or FFF) is a youth-led and -organized, independent global climate strike movement that started in August 2018, when 15-year-old Greta Thunberg began a school strike for climate, sitting outside the Swedish Parliament every school day, demanding urgent action on the climate crisis. The goal of the movement is to put moral pressure on policymakers, to make them listen to the scientists and take actions to limit global warming. Source


    Previous 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights