TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Christianity

    Daily Theology Podcast

    The Daily Theology Podcast features conversations about the craft and vocation of theology. We speak with theologians from a variety of disciplines and traditions

    stephenokey.substack.com

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    #53 - Rabbi Shai Held Nov 12, 2024
    Show notes

    In this month’s episode, I talk with Rabbi Shai Held, who is President of the Hadar Institute. Rabbi Held was visiting my institution, Saint Leo University, at the invitation of our Center for Catholic Jewish Studies. We spoke about his new book, Judaism is About Love: Recovering the Heart of Jewish Life, the role his parents played in his early interests in theology, and on what it means to love one’s enemies.

    Rabbi Shai Held is the President and Dean at the Hadar Institute in New York City. He earned his AB in Religion from Harvard University, his MA in Jewish Philosophy at the Jewish Theological Seminary, and his PhD in Religious Studies from Harvard University. He is the author of Abraham Joshua Heschel: The Call of Transcendence (Indiana University Press, 2013), The Heart of the Torah volumes one and two (Jewish Publication Society, 2017), and Judaism is About Love (Picador, 2024).

    I have again had an unexpected hiatus, and I won’t bore you with promises of upcoming consistency. I plan on two more episodes coming out in 2024, but what I plan on and what actually comes out ain’t ever exactly been similar.


    Get full access to Okeydoxy at stephenokey.substack.com/subscribe

    #52 - Elissa Cutter Apr 29, 2024
    Show notes

    In today’s episode, I talk with Elissa Cutter of Georgian Court University in Lakewood, NJ. I first met Elissa when we were undergrads at Georgetown University in Fr. Walsh’s Hebrew Scriptures seminar. In this conversation, we talk about her early interest in politics, stemming from growing up in a political family; her experience studying theology in France after the 9/11 attacks, and her work on feminist historical theology. Dr. Elissa Cutter is an Assistant Professor of Religious Studies and Theology at Georgian Court University in Lakewood, NJ. She earned her BA in French and Theology at Georgetown University, her MA in Theology from the Dominican School of Philosophy and Theology, and her PhD in Theological Studies from Saint Louis University. Her research focuses on Mother Angelique Arnauld, the 17th century abbess and reformer at the convent of Port-Royal, as well as the wider Jansenist movement in France. She is also an editor at Women In Theology. I apologize that I didn’t have this episode out last month, but I was beset by illness that I’ve only recently come out of. I’m planning to release three episodes over the next two months to make up for the gap, so look forward to those.You can also see the full transcript for this episode below.Thanks as always to Matt Hines of the band Eastern Sea for providing the music for the Daily Theology Podcast.Transcript of Episode #52 - Elissa Cutter[Opening Music]Stephen Okey: Welcome to the Daily Theology Podcast, a podcast on the craft and vocation of theology.I'm your host, Stephen Okey.In today's episode, I talk with Elissa Cutter of Georgian Court University in Lakewood, New Jersey. I first met Elissa when we were undergrads at Georgetown University in Father Walsh's Hebrew Scriptures seminar.In this conversation, we talk about her early interest in politics stemming, from growing up in a political family; her experience studying theology in France after the 9/11 attacks; and her work on feminist historical theology.I apologize that I didn't have this episode out last month, but I was beset by illness that I am still coming out of, which you can perhaps hear in my voice. I'm planning to release three episodes over the next two months to make up for the gap. So look forward to those.I hope you enjoy the episode and thank you for listening.[Music Transition]Stephen Okey: Today for the Daily Theology Podcast, I'm talking with my friend, Elissa Cutter, from Georgian Court University in New Jersey. Elissa, thank you for being here.Elissa Cutter: Yeah. Thank you so much for inviting me.Stephen Okey: I like to begin by asking, how did you get into studying theology?Elissa Cutter: Yeah, thank you. Gosh, I feel like my story is, is very convoluted. And it is, you know, like so many others it was not my intention to study theology initially. I think I should start with a little bit of background, which is that my family was actually very involved in politics in Massachusetts.So, the closest person to me in this, as a kind of role model in this was my grandfather, and he had been Attorney General of Massachusetts, and he also ran against Ted Kennedy for the Democratic nomination for Senate.Stephen Okey: Wow.Elissa Cutter: And lost.Stephen Okey: Yeah, yeah, I figured.Elissa Cutter: Um, but that, that was actually a big thing, like, in the debate, he, there was this line, and I, I'm probably going to misquote it, but he basically said to him, if your name were Edward Moore instead of Edward Moore Kennedy, your candidacy would be a joke.And, yeah, so people felt bad for Kennedy, apparently. And, so, yeah, my grandfather lost. But it, so he wasn't just, I should note, my grandfather was also running a little bit on his name as well. His, um, uncle at the time was Speaker of the House of Representatives. So, like my family had been involved in politics for a while in Massachusetts.Stephen Okey: And these were the McCormacks?Elissa Cutter: Yes, these are the McCormacks. John W. McCormacks was Speaker of the House under Kennedy. And my grandfather's name was Edward. And I basically decided that I, I wanted to be the first female senator from Massachusetts. So shout out to Elizabeth Warren, who was the first female senator from Massachusetts.Um, but that was what I wanted to do, and so I decided to go to Georgetown. I wanted to be in DC, and I also went in as a French major because I was interested in kind of international stuff and I had been studying French for so long and I wanted to keep doing that, so those are, that's kind of the background.The very first semester I was at Georgetown, I was taking, the United States political systems class, which was the required class for the government major. And at the same time taking the kind of gen ed requirement of Problem of God, with, Father King. And the U.S. Political systems class, just bored me out of my mind.I very quickly decided that that was not going to be my path. And at the same time, I was so fascinated by, by Father King's class and the ideas that he was putting out in front of us. And I, I just, I wanted more of that. So initially I decided to do a theology minor along with my French major. But what happened was I, as a French major was planning to go abroad in my junior year, and one of the things that French major or language majors at Georgetown have to do is you have to reach a certain level in a second language as well.So I had been taking Brazilian Portuguese, because why not? And when I went to discuss studying abroad with my advisor, they basically said, Don't take language while you're abroad. So I had taken my sophomore year, I had done a year of Brazilian Portuguese. They were like, don't take language while you're abroad because, First of all, it's going to be the wrong kind of Portuguese.You're going to be doing Portugal Portuguese in France, and you don't want to be doing that. It'll kind of mess you up, but also, it'll be, you know, extra hard to take another language through, you know, something that's already a second language. Except that in order to graduate, I would have to pick up exactly where I left off when I came back.So, I was kind of freaking out with my roommates, like, I'm not going to be able to graduate because there's no way that I can do this, this is totally unreasonable of them. And one of my roommates said, why don't you just do a theology major? So, like, quite literally, this was like super practical considerations that actually made me a theology major.Stephen Okey: I don't hear that very often.Elissa Cutter: But I remember that moment though, weirdly enough, like she said that, and I just kind of like stopped my rant in the middle of our apartment. And it was like, yeah, like that makes sense. So I do feel like in some ways there was this like, providential hand guiding me along the way, and, you know, leading me to make all of these decisions.So, anyway, I ended up not going abroad for a whole year, as you know, because we were in classes together, because of 9/11. So I was actually originally supposed to fly out of Boston to go to France, like the Friday after 9/11, and at the time, the Boston airport was not going to be open, and it was not sure when it was going to be open, so there was no sense of, like, when I would actually be able to get to France.Stephen Okey: I mean, I think people forget that, like, all airspace was shut down for, like, four days after 9/11, and then, I mean, in D. C., it was several weeks, because I, I remember being on the lawn in front of Healy the first time we saw a plane fly over after 9/11, and you just saw everybody just stop and look, at what had previously been a very normal occurrence, like, you just learned to stop conversing with people when the planes flew over.Elissa Cutter: I know it was, it was such a wild experience. So Georgetown gave us the option of either waiting and going abroad whenever we could get there or coming back to campus. And I actually opted to come back to campus and then just go abroad for the spring semester.So, I mean, that was a, that was a huge effect, but I ended up coming back and taking a bunch of, you know, theology classes, which I think I was in with all of them with you at that time, and then I went abroad to France and in France as well I was also mostly taking theology classes.So there's actually an interesting thing I should add in here. So I was studying in Strasbourg, which is the only public university in France, which has a faculty of theology. The reason is that when France got rid of theology in all of their universities, Strasbourg was part of Germany, so, uh, you know, all of that weird history and back and forth of that area between Germany and France, it's now French, but, they still have a faculty of Catholic theology and a faculty of Protestant theology there.Stephen Okey: What was it like studying theology in France? I mean, even in Strasbourg, like, I imagine there was still some amount of, you know, the sense of laïcité and religious resistance and so forth.Elissa Cutter: Yeah, I mean I had classes with monks and nuns at the time, you know. So I had an ethics class that I took there, a class in the history of the liturgy, which was very hard to do through another language, I will say. Actually the class that inspired me most and this one's kind of interesting because it's what really led me on my path was not one of my theology classes, but I took a class in 16th and 17th century French literature. And in that class it was three hours every week, and the first hour was lecture, and then the second and third hours were like discussion section.And in the discussion section, we read Pascal's Pensées. And that was the only book that we read the whole semester. And, but here's, I know, but here's the interesting thing about that. So. It wasn't so much what kind of the teacher was teaching us about how to read the Pensées, but what I had learned about how to interpret texts from our Old Testament professor, Father Walsh.So he was super into language and like word choice and analyzing the meaning of words and I applied that to the Pensées and it just like opened it up for me. And I got really, really into that. And then basically when I came back from studying abroad, you know, I had had this experience of kind of only doing theology or practically only doing theology.And I was like, this is what I want to do all of a sudden. I just like the light went on and I decided, no, I don't want to do whatever else I had envisioned myself doing at that point. I don't even rememberStephen Okey: You had by this point long given up being the first female Senator from Massachusetts. Yeah.Elissa Cutter: Yeah. So I didn't want to go into politics anymore.I mean, this was also like, after, you know, the 2000 election. And I remember waiting up with people in Leavey watching the election results all night because it didn't end. So yeah, it was definitely a disillusionment point at some point in that whole process.But yeah, I, and then I went on and now I, I grew through Pascal, but weird other twists and turns that I don't need to go into necessarily. Now I study Jansenism and the Port Royal nuns, so.Stephen Okey: So beyond the lights coming on moment of encountering Pascal, what was it that made you, as someone coming out of, you know, a Jesuit University, and eventually, I mean, you went to St. Louis University for your doctorate program, also a Jesuit school, what was it that drew you to studying the Jansenists?Elissa Cutter: Well, it was definitely Pascal. I mean, that was the initial, the initial impetus. You know, it's, it's hard to remember, because I did my master's thesis on Antoine Arnault's early writings. And I, I don't entirely remember how I got onto that specific topic. I do remember reading, this is going to be a weird thing, but I, I read Dale Van Kley's book on the religious origins of the French Revolution.And there is this footnote that I've since pointed out to people that just really bothered me. And it's, it's funny cause it's just a footnote. But when he's discussing, some of the 18th century ideas, and he's saying that these ideas are Jansenist ideas, and there's this footnote that basically says, these may be more Gallican ideas than Jansenist, but at the time, Jansenism had been so radicalized that it's the same thing, or something like that.And I was like, no, it's not, those are two different things that were both present in France. But they're not the same. So you can't point to Gallican ideas. So I feel like I should explain what Gallicanism, okay. Yeah.Stephen Okey: And Jansenism for that matter.Elissa Cutter: Yeah. Okay. Well, so Gallicanism is this like particular view of the church in France, especially in early modern France, but kind of throughout French history, where it's not the Pope, it's the French Church that's in charge of the French Church. And there's different types of this, depending on who exactly you think has that responsibility, whether it would have been the king, the parliament, the bishops, there was also kind of a theological version of this as well, but that's basically the idea of Gallicanism.Jansenism is a little bit also more complicated, and I think that there's two things to distinguish. Which is, the movement and the theology. In terms of Jansenism, I define Jansenism according to basically three to five characteristics. I think I'm landing on five right now. These are, first, an Augustinian theology of grace.Second, a rigorist view of the sacraments, so especially in terms of kind of confession and being truly sorry for your sins and before you can take the Eucharist, so kind of abstaining from the Eucharist, because of that.And then conflict between the Jesuits and the Jansenists.Stephen Okey: So number one is Augustinian view of grace. Number two is a rigorist view of the sacraments.Elissa Cutter: Three is the hatred of the Jesuits. So but these also lead into other things, which is why I'm, I'm up to five characteristics now.So the combination of the Jansenist view of grace and the rigorist view of the sacraments led to a tendency for people to withdraw from the world, whether that was formally like the Port-Royal nuns into religious life, or like the, what were known as the Solitaires, which were the men who lived next to Port-Royal and kind of withdrew from their government service, which kind of pissed a lot of people off, who live semi-monastic life next to the convent in Port-Royal. So this tendency to withdraw from the world is a Jansenist characteristic.And then the fifth one is related to the Augustine aspect of it, which is the tendency to see the ideal of Christianity in the early church, or the example of the early church.Stephen Okey: That one sounds in particular why I think people sometimes see Jansenism as akin to some elements of the Protestant Reformation, which often had this very idealized or, or rose colored vision of the early church and the structure of the early church and the sense that that had just simply been, you know, corrupted by centuries of Rome and the papacy and, and, and councils as well.Elissa Cutter: Yeah, and the, the, I mean, there's other kind of complicated aspects related to that, and which is the, you know, the influence of Augustine was also another thing that is connected to, you know, people accuse them of being crypto Calvinist for their views that they took from Augustine, but also there's this complication with the Arnauld family that half of their relatives were actually Protestants.So the family at the center of the controversy, like, had that tangen…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    #51 - Jessica Coblentz Feb 29, 2024
    Show notes

    For this month’s episode of the Daily Theology Podcast, I spoke with Professor Jessica Coblentz. We talk about the influence of Henri Nouwen’s Life of the Beloved on her path to studying religion, her research on theology and depression, and thinking theologically about suffering. We focus especially on her book, Dust in the Blood: A Theology of Life with Depression, which I recommend you all go out and get after you listen to the episode (you can order it direct from the publisher here or from the behemoth here).

    Dr. Jessica Coblentz is an Associate Professor of Religious Studies and Theology at St. Mary’s College in Notre Dame, Indiana. She holds a BA from Santa Clara University, an MTS from Harvard Divinity School, and a PhD from Boston College. She is the author of Dust in the Blood: A Theology of Life with Depression (Liturgical Press, 2022), which won the 2023 award for best book from the College Theology Society. She also co-edited The Human in a Dehumanizing World: Re-Examining Theological Anthropology and Its Implications (Orbis, 2022) with Daniel Horan, OFM.

    Thanks as always to Matt Hines of the band Eastern Sea for providing the music for the Daily Theology Podcast.


    Get full access to Okeydoxy at stephenokey.substack.com/subscribe

    #50 - Heather Miller Rubens Jan 31, 2024
    Show notes

    For the first Daily Theology Podcast episode of 2024, we welcome Heather Miller Rubens of the Institute for Islamic, Christian, and Jewish Studies. We talk about how her early interest in Hebrew scriptures led to the study of Jewish Catholic relations, the work of the ICJS, and about how to do interreligious dialogue well. We focus especially on her forthcoming project, In Good Faith: An Argument for an Interreligious Society, and her argument that the public sphere actually needs more talk about religion, not less, if we want to live in a healthy and functioning society. Dr. Heather Miller Rubens is the Executive Director and Roman Catholic Scholar at the Institute for Islamic, Christian, and Jewish Studies (ICJS). She has a BA from Georgetown University, and an MA and PhD from the University of Chicago Divinity School. Her research focuses on theological, ethical, and political issues relating to the roles of religion and interreligious dialogue in the public square. You can also see the full transcript for this episode below.Thanks as always to Matt Hines of the band Eastern Sea for providing the music for the Daily Theology Podcast. Transcript of Episode #50 - Heather Miller Rubens#50 – Heather Miller Rubens[Opening Music]Stephen Okey: Welcome to the Daily Theology Podcast, a podcast on the craft and vocation of theology. I'm your host, Stephen Okey.In today's episode, I talk with Heather Miller Rubens, who is the Executive Director and Roman Catholic scholar at the Institute for Islamic, Christian, and Jewish Studies. We talk about how her early interest in Hebrew scriptures led to the study of Jewish Catholic relations, the work of the ICJS, and about how to do inter-religious dialogue well. We focus especially on her forthcoming project "In Good Faith: An Argument for an Interreligious Society," and her argument that the public sphere actually needs more talk about religion, not less, if we want to live in a healthy and functioning society.Thanks to everyone who has subscribed through Substack, where this podcast is joined to my Okeydoxy newsletter. New episodes of the podcast will come out each month while newsletters will come out every two weeks or so. The next one of those will be on Martin Scorsese's "The Last Temptation of Christ" as part of my "Celluloid Christ" series.I hope you enjoy the episode and thanks for listening.[Music Transition]Stephen Okey: Today for the Daily Theology Podcast, I'm talking to my friend, Heather Miller Rubens. Heather, thank you for being here.Heather Miller Rubens: Thank you for inviting me.Stephen Okey: You are the executive director, and Roman Catholic scholar at the Institute for Islamic, Christian, and Jewish Studies, which sounds like a lot of heavy double duty. So I like to, I like to open by asking people, how did you get into doing theology?Heather Miller Rubens: Yeah, so I went to Catholic school my whole life, from elementary school through college, at Georgetown University, where we met as undergrads so many, many years ago. And I was a double major in theology and creative writing. And towards the end of my time there, I actually took a Hebrew Bible class with Father Jim Walsh and started learning Biblical Hebrew with him, and he sort of encouraged me to keep going with religion, the study of religion, as did a lot of my other undergraduate mentors as well.And I knew I wanted to, to, to study a religion that I didn't identify with. It wasn't mine and really very much enjoyed Hebrew, and so went to the Oxford Center for Hebrew and Jewish Studies for a 1 year masters and sort of immerse myself in the study of Judaism and the study of the Hebrew language, and then went to the University of Chicago to pursue a doctoral degree and an additional masters.And at the University of Chicago I was able to combine my doctoral studies with Judaism and Christianity, and do that under the history of Judaism section. So, I actually trained as a historian at the University of Chicago, focusing on the early 20th century and Jewish Catholic relations in Europe and in the United States.And then the job posted at the institute for, um, at the time the Institute for Christian and Jewish Studies. They were looking for a Roman Catholic scholar who was interested in Catholic Jewish relations, which was exactly what my dissertation was about.And so I applied and landed at ICJS and, we're an academic nonprofit, and so the organization is very much focused on, not only religion in this kind of academic classroom, but religion in community. So we work a lot with, religious practitioners, so clergy and religious leaders and congregations, but we also work with the general public, and folks who have different relationships to religion.And so, in my work at ICJS since 2011, I keep asking more and more theological questions and more and more questions of belief and how our beliefs, not only about our own communities, but our beliefs about each other, so, especially beliefs that cross religious traditions, really impact our, our relationship to one another and sort of helping people explore what that means.So the, the kind of horizontal relationships, the intergroup relationships, between communities and between individuals, and then how that, the vertical relationship with, with the divine, with God, how that impacts those relationships.Stephen Okey: So I want to step back, just to something you said, which was, you know, as you were wrapping up undergrad, you wanted to study something that was outside your own religious tradition or something that you did not yourself identify with. Why? What was it that was motivating you there?Heather Miller Rubens: Ah, that's a great question. I don't know. I think it was a, uh,Stephen Okey: That's fair.Heather Miller Rubens: I like how, how much you could apply agency to, to some choices made in your early twenties. Um, I'm not entirely positive. I, I think I had a, just a deep curiosity about the Jewish tradition in particular and the Hebrew Bible was the sort of entry point into that.And then just learning more about rabbinic tradition and interpretation of the Hebrew Bible, and how much it is different than Catholic interpretation, Christian interpretation of the Hebrew Bible. And so what does it mean when two communities share a common text, but interpret that text in, in different ways, and how do you sit with that? How do you sit with that reality? And again, even right within, of course, within each tradition, there's so much diversity that sort of internal diversity to interpretation, but diversity across traditions is what really interested me. And I wanted to go deeper into that.Stephen Okey: Yeah, that makes sense. I know for me, part of why I went into theology was trying to work out my own issues, uh, on some level. And so it's, it's nice to hear something that's kind of a more healthy response, maybe, uh, for academic interests.Heather Miller Rubens: I'll also say, and this is something I've circled back to now in, in, in sort of my practice as a, I identify as kind of a scholar practitioner of interreligious dialogue at this point, that my academic interest is in the so called Jewish question. And so what does it mean for the modern nation state to be born in, in, in the sort of European context and to come up and say, religious diversity is a problem for the modern nation state.And, you know, the, the, the horrific answer to the so called Jewish question is the final solution of the Holocaust. And so what does it mean when a Christian society decides that religious diversity internal within it, it's not possible and, and seeks a genocidal response. And so, and I think those questions about the status of religious diversity, what, what does it mean to live in a religiously diverse world?Is that always a problem? I think that that is a core interest that I've carried from my time at Georgetown to my time at ICJS.Stephen Okey: Yeah, I definitely, I want to keep talking about this one. So I had other questions I'll come back to, but you're currently working on a project called "In Good Faith: An Argument for an Interreligious Society," where you're dealing with this question, right, at least the reality of religious diversity in a, in a pluralist society. And there's definitely, as you've said, there's a framing of that as a problem that asks for a solution. And that solution has historically in many cases turned genocidal, violent, discriminatory. Could you talk a bit about this project and what you are sort of setting out to do?Heather Miller Rubens: Yeah, so, after over a decade now at ICJS, I feel like I keep having to make an argument as to why people should engage in interreligious work, why people should engage honestly in more religion talk rather than less religion talk with one another. And so sort of the basic motivation is bringing that level of argumentation that I've made to both participants in our program, community members, and just the sort of broader community in the United States that that may or may not want to engage in religion talk as to why it's necessary.And I, I think in the United States, and I very much want to ground our dialogue work in the United States, because interreligious work looks different in different social and cultural contexts, but in the United States, we have this kind of ideal of welcoming citizens of all religion and no religion, as a sort of an aspiration, but we just rarely engage interreligiously as a civic practice and so people aren't comfortable doing so.And I would say that the question of how diverse citizens should bring their religious voices to civic conversations is the sort of animating idea as to why I want to write this book, and I want to make an argument for a multi religious democracy and what does a functional multi religious democracy look like.And the book is not meant to be a blueprint of an answer to that question. It's to, um, I, I want to state that very clearly. It's a real framing. It's a framing of the question in a slightly different way, and an invitation to both regular citizens, to theologians, to political scientists, to legal scholars, to say, okay, well, what happens if religious diversity isn't a problem anymore, but what happens if religious diversity is actually the end goal that we're constantly working for.Um, and that's including folks who would identify as as not religious or as secular or religiously unaffiliated. And so if that's the goal, how do we then reorient our conversations, to keep that goal, in place?And I would say that there's two things that kind of stand in the way in the United States context. One is a sort of Christian nationalist or Christian supremacy response, which is saying religious diversity is a reality, but it's a problem. And there has to be one religious group that's on top and we may or may not tolerate the other religions or the place of non religion, or even dissent within religion, and so there's a kind of Christian supremacy as a domination model response.And then what I'm, I'm coining the phrase secular supremacy as the other alternative, which I think is another domination response, but actually seeks to banish religious diversity from the public square and not allow for religion talk to be practiced.And so what happens with where we've got one domination model that says, there's only one way to talk about religion and another that sort of pushes religion out. Most people don't have any real practice or comfort with engaging in religion talk across difference, and I think that that inability, that the fact that we don't really have both the intellectual space, the spiritual space to do that kind of work is hurting us as a, as a country.Stephen Okey: I'm not a particular scholar or practitioner of inter religious dialogue, I sort of have, maybe my, dipped my toes in it. It seems to me that most of my encounter with it In theology, at least, has primarily been, so one, it's, it's often sort of tradition to tradition.It's sort of a bilateral, but not, you know, often multilateral kind of conversation. And it tends to be very focused on either sort of theological questions. And so you get, Roman Catholic Muslim dialogue around, you know, the meaning of word of God or the role of Mary, things like that. Or it tends to be sort of good neighbor practices, you know, in terms of the, the local parish and the local synagogue have some kind of joint venture to build relationships and so forth. And, It's never really struck me particularly as something that people have focused on until what you're talking about, in terms of how is inter religious dialogue productive on the level of public discourse, the civic square, the public square. And so it's an interesting trajectory to be taking the questions that I think often emerge in inter religious dialogue.Heather Miller Rubens: Yeah, I mean, to build on that, I would say that interreligious dialogue is sort of bubbling under the surface of a lot of culture war questions. I kind of don't like the term, and I think that, especially in the U. S. courts, there's increasingly attention, where anti discrimination values and principles are being pitted against religious liberty. And I feel like those argumentations are getting sharper and sharper, and only allowing a certain type of religious voice to claim to be a religious voice in the sort of public square and in a courtroom setting and the reality is, is that where there's a lot more religious diversity about questions around bodily autonomy, around gender, around being a good neighbor. What does it mean to have a business in a diverse community? All of those types of things. And so this is where it may be, it may be counterintuitive to a lot of folks that I think we actually need more religion talk to address this problem rather than less.Cause I think there's a lot of people who are in favor of a multi religious democracy as a concept, as an ideal, but assume that the best way to do that is to privatize religion and to have no religion talk happen in the public square. And so I would say that we have done work with teachers and secondary education in both religious schools and independent or private schools, which you can imagine that they have like world religions classes, but also public school teachers who are encountering religious diversity in history and in literature and are unsure as public school educators how they can bring religious diversity and into their classroom and respect the 1st amendment and respect their students and respect themselves also in the process, understand where they're coming from in that space. And the fact that we can't have those types of conversations or have them very rarely, I think is a problem.And so the book is trying to make an argument that we need to be doing this more with one another, and recognize also that it's, it's iterative work. It's really messy work and it requires a long period of time and a commitment to relationship. Because I think that there's another way in which interfaith as it's often practiced is polite conversation done in a one 60 minute session, and then that's it.And that's not the kind of, it's a one off thing, and that's not the kind of work that we try to do at ICJS and it's not the kind of work that I'm actually talking about in the book, I, I want to see folks who are in long term relationships with one another in their communities, whatever those communities may be, they may be geographically located communities, but they also may be professional communities. Bu…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    #49 - Chris Bellitto Oct 19, 2023
    Show notes

    This episode welcomes Chris Bellitto of Kean University to the podcast. We talk about his first career as a journalist, as well as how that background helped him as a scholar, teacher, and public commentator on church events. We also discuss working with students in the classroom in a way that both provokes reflection while sustaining civil conversation…


    Get full access to Okeydoxy at stephenokey.substack.com/subscribe

    #48 - Nichole Flores Sep 28, 2023
    Show notes

    In our newest episode of the podcast, I talk with my friend and fellow Boston College alum Nichole Flores. We talk about how working with the Coalition of Immokalee Workers during divinity school helped her understand her vocation as a theologian, how she understands the public role of the theologian, including at public universities, and her work on the intersection of theology and democracy. We also talk extensively about her book The Aesthetics of Solidarity (https://amzn.to/3EUcOSk) and the diverse ways that people appropriate significant religious symbols like Our Lady of Guadalupe.
    Dr. Nichole Marie Flores (https://religiousstudies.as.virginia.edu/nichole-m-flores) is Associate Professor of Religious Studies at the University of Virginia. She earner her AB in Government at Smith College, her MDiv from Yale Divinity School, and her PhD in Theological Ethics from Boston College. Her research focuses on the intersection of Catholic ethics, theological aesthetics, and democracy. She is the author of The Aesthetics of Solidarity: Our Lady of Guadalupe and American Democracy (https://amzn.to/3EUcOSk) (Georgetown University Press, 2021).
    Get full access to Okeydoxy at stephenokey.substack.com/subscribe


    #47 - Jon Malesic Jul 19, 2023
    Show notes

    In our second episode back from hiatus, Steve Okey speaks with Jon Malesic, author of The End of Burnout from University of California Press. They talk about how his early interest in physics and the mysteries of the universe drew him to study theology, how his personal experience with burnout led to his research on it, and where he now situates himself with respect to theology.
    Jon Malesic (https://twitter.com/JonMalesic?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor) is an author, journalist, and scholar who teaches writing at Southern Methodist University and University of Texas at Dallas. He previously was an associate professor of theology at King’s College in Wilkes-Barre, PA. He earned his BA degree from the Catholic University of America and his PhD from the University of Virginia. He is the author of two books, Secret Faith in the Public Square (https://amzn.to/3OE1Wyg) (Brazos, 2009), and The End of Burnout: Why Work Drains Us and How to Build Better Lives (https://amzn.to/3BWkQsG) (University of California Press, 2022). For more on Jon Malesic, you can visit his website (https://jonmalesic.com/) or subscribe to his Substack newsletter (https://jonmalesic.substack.com/).
    Thanks as always to Matt Hines of the band Eastern Sea (https://open.spotify.com/artist/1g7l0o1IobV06d8Y4kyEhY) for providing the music for the Daily Theology Podcast.
    You can support the Daily Theology Podcast at Patreon for as little as $2 a month (https://www.patreon.com/dailytheopod), or you can buy Steve a cup of tea at Ko-Fi.com (https://ko-fi.com/dailytheopod).
    You can find the Daily Theology Podcast on
    Twitter (https://twitter.com/DailyTheoPod)
    Instagram (http://www.instagram.com/dailytheopod)
    YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/@dailytheopod)
    Get full access to Okeydoxy at stephenokey.substack.com/subscribe


    #46 - Amanda Osheim May 23, 2023
    Show notes

    Yes, the show is back, and for our first episode after the long hiatus, we’re sharing Stephen Okey’s conversation with Amanda Osheim. In this episode we learn how she was drawn to study theology, and in particular ecclesiology or the study of the church. In light of that, we talked extensively about the concept of synodality, what’s happening with the synod on synodality, and some of the questions people have about it.
    Dr. Amanda Osheim is an Associate Professor of Practical Theology at Loras College (https://www.loras.edu/) in Dubuque Iowa, where she is also the Endowed Professor for the Breitbach Catholic Thinker and Leaders Program. She earned her BA and MA from University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, MN; and her Ph.D. in Systematic Theology from Boston College. Her research focuses in ecclesiology, and her first book, A Ministry of Discernment: The Bishop and the Sense of the Faithful (https://amzn.to/44ot8q6), was published by Liturgical Press in 2016.
    Thanks as always to Matt Hines of the band Eastern Sea (https://open.spotify.com/artist/1g7l0o1IobV06d8Y4kyEhY) for providing the music for the Daily Theology Podcast.
    Support the show!
    Leave reviews on Spotify (https://open.spotify.com/show/4DtBqwLYE9amYCuEkJdqwK), Apple Podcasts (https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/daily-theology-podcast/id981555001), Stitcher (https://www.stitcher.com/show/daily-theology-podcast), or wherever else!
    Follow us on Twitter (https://twitter.com/dailytheopod), Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/dailytheopod/), and YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/@dailytheopod)!
    Become a patron on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/dailytheopod)! Three tiers available!
    Thanks for listening!
    Get full access to Okeydoxy at stephenokey.substack.com/subscribe


    Long Hiatus is Over May 16, 2023
    Show notes

    The Daily Theology Podcast returns after almost four years away! Steve gives some life updates and some podcast updates.
    Support the show!
    Leave reviews on Spotify (https://open.spotify.com/show/4DtBqwLYE9amYCuEkJdqwK), Apple Podcasts (https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/daily-theology-podcast/id981555001), Stitcher (https://www.stitcher.com/show/daily-theology-podcast), or wherever else!
    Follow us on Twitter (https://twitter.com/dailytheopod), Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/dailytheopod/), and YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/@dailytheopod)!
    Become a patron on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/dailytheopod)! Three tiers available!
    Thanks for listening!
    Get full access to Okeydoxy at stephenokey.substack.com/subscribe


    #45 - Anne Michelle Carpenter Jun 28, 2019
    Show notes

    The June episode of the podcast features Anne Michelle Carpenter of St. Mary’s College of California! She spoke with Stephen Okey about how reading Patristic theology led her to study Hans Urs von Balthasar, the challenge and promise of teaching metaphysics to undergraduates, and the way she engages poetry in her work. They also talk a lot about Star Wars, including Prof. Carpenter’s January term course on Star Wars and Religion!

    Dr. Anne Michelle Carpenter is an Assistant Professor of Theology at St. Mary’s College of California in Moraga, CA. She earned her BA in History and Theology from Franciscan University of Steubenville, and then earned an MA and a PhD in Systematic Theology from Marquette University. Her research interests focus on the interrelations between aesthetics and metaphysics, with particular interest in the work of Hans Urs von Balthasar. She is the author of Theo-Poetics: Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Risk of Art and Being (University of Notre Dame Press, 2015).


    Get full access to Okeydoxy at stephenokey.substack.com/subscribe

    1 2 3 6 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Joel Osteen Podcast

    1

    Joel Osteen Podcast Christianity
    Joel Osteen Podcast

    2

    Joel Osteen Podcast Christianity
    The Bible For Normal People

    3

    The Bible For Normal People Christianity
    The Liturgists Podcast

    4

    The Liturgists Podcast Christianity
    Firestarters

    5

    Firestarters Christianity
    Elevation with Steven Furtick

    6

    Elevation with Steven Furtick Christianity
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights