TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Audio Arguendo

    Audio Arguendo provides unedited recordings of oral arguments from the Supreme Court and interesting cases from around the globe. If you have a case that you think we should broadcast, just send us a message on X (@AudioArguendo) or Bluesky (@audioarguendo.bsky.social) with the name of the case, a short description of the issue, and a link to where the audio can be found. We assert no claim of copyright over any of the recordings and have posted them in podcast form to make them more widely and conveniently available.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © CC BY 4.0

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    USCA, D.C. Circuit Woodhull Freedom Foundation v. United States, Case No. 18-5298 Sep 23, 2019
    Show notes

    Civil Procedure: Do advocates of free speech on the internet and groups supporting sex workers lack standing to challenge a federal law that targets sex trafficking online? - Argued September 20, 2019


    USCA, Fourth Circuit United States v. Under Seal, Case No. 19-1730 Sep 12, 2019
    Show notes

    Criminal Procedure: May prosecutors create a "taint team" to review the emails of criminal defense attorneys for privilege, or must that be done by a magistrate? - Argued September 10, 2019


    USCA, Ninth Circuit Velasquez-Reyes v. Samsung, Case No. 17-56556 Aug 30, 2019
    Show notes

    Civil Procedure: Does a notice on the packaging of the Samsung Galaxy S7 constitute a "clear statement" that the purchaser agrees to arbitration? - Argued August 29, 2019


    USCA, Second Circuit Cox v. Spirit Airlines, Case No. 18-3484 Aug 30, 2019
    Show notes

    Civil Procedure: Should passengers of Spirit Airlines be allowed to sue as a class, where Spirit allegedly misrepresented its baggage allowance? - Argued August 29, 2019


    USCA, Second Circuit Trump v. Deutsche Bank, Case No. 19-1540 Aug 27, 2019
    Show notes

    Civil Procedure: May Congress subpoena the tax returns and other financial records of President Trump from a third-party bank? - Argued August 23, 2019


    USCA, Fifth Circuit In re Gee, Case No. 19-30353 Aug 12, 2019
    Show notes

    Abortion: May Louisiana obtain a writ of mandamus to dismiss lawsuits challenging its enactment of abortion restrictions? - Argued August 9, 2019


    USCA, Ninth Circuit Monster Energy Company v. City Beverages, Case No. 17-55813 Jul 16, 2019
    Show notes

    Arbitration: Must arbitrators disclose whether they have an ownership stake in the arbitration company for whom they work? - Argued July 12, 2019


    USCA, D.C. Circuit Trump v. Mazars, Case No. 19-5142 Jul 15, 2019
    Show notes

    Separation of Powers: May the Executive refuse to comply with a Congressional subpoena based upon its assertion that it lacks a legitimate legislative purpose? - Argued July 12, 2019


    USCA, Fifth Circuit Texas v. United States, Case No. 19-10011 Jul 09, 2019
    Show notes

    Healthcare: Did the repeal of the Affordable Care Act's tax on not having health insurance require the invalidation of the entire law? - Argued July 9, 2019


    Indiana Supreme Court Indiana v. Timbs, Case No. 27A04-1511-MI-01976 Jul 01, 2019
    Show notes

    Criminal Procedure: Following a remand from the Supreme Court, does the forfeiture of an automobile following a conviction for drug trafficking violate the Excessive Fines Clause? - Argued June 28, 2019


    Previous 1 140 141 142 143 144 168 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights