TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    A Hard Look

    A Hard Look is an administrative law podcast produced in conjunction with the Administrative Law Review at American University’s Washington College of Law. On the podcast, we dive into some of the new developments shaping the current landscape of administrative law and regulatory policy and we discuss some of the ways that administrative law impacts attorneys, industries, and people.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © Administrative Law Review

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    A Hard Look at the President's Removal Power Apr 30, 2025
    Show notes

    On this episode of A Hard Look, we examine the President’s power to remove independent agency officials. That’s right! We’re going all the way back to the 1935 landmark decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States. Helping us navigate this discussion is Daniel Wolff, Partner at Crowell & Moring LLP, and head of the firm’s administrative law practice. Tune in for an in-depth discussion on the future of executive authority and regulatory independence.

    Show Notes:

    Editorial Note: This episode was recorded in March 2025, and the status of any ongoing cases discussed may have changed since then.

    Recommended Readings

    • Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935)

    • Myers v. United States (1926)

    • Morrison v. Olson (1988)

    • Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2020)

    • Trump v. Wilcox (2025)


    This episode was produced by the Administrative Law Review Senior Technology Editor, Sophia Navedo-Quinones, and Technology Editor, Victoria Paul.

    If you have any questions about this episode or the podcast, or if you would like to propose a topic or guest, please e-mail us at ALR-Sr-Tech-Editor@wcl.american.edu.





    Visit our website: https://administrativelawreview.org/podcast-a-hard-look/


    The Post-Loper Bright Landscape Apr 02, 2025
    Show notes

    On this episode of A Hard Look, we’re discussing the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright; the case that overruled the infamous Chevron Doctrine. Since last summer, there has been meaningful legal developments within lower circuits. Professor of Law and legal scholar, Cary Coglianese, joins us to discuss what—if any—indications these decisions mean for a post-Loper Bright landscape.(*)


    * Editorial Note:At the time of recording, this episode referred to the article Professor Coglianese wrote with Professor Daniel E. Walters, “The Great Unsettling: Administrative Governance After Loper Bright,” as “forthcoming.” This article has since been published and is now available online at the adminstrativelawreview.org.


    The transcript of the episode can be found here or on our website.


    Show Notes:

    Listen to our pre-Loper Bright episode, where we interviewed Daniel M. Sullivan to discuss the critiques and weaknesses of Chevron doctrine, potential constitutional problems with judicial review of agency decisions, and what administrative law may look like after the decision.

    Read more:

    • Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024)

    • Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo on SCOTUS Blog

    • Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and the Future of Agency Interpretations of Law by Congressional Research Service (Dec. 31, 2024)

    • The Great Unsettling: Administrative Governance After Loper Bright by Cary Coglianese & Daniel E. Walters


    DOJ’s “Bad Blood” with Live Nation-Ticketmaster Feb 14, 2025
    Show notes

    How did a chaotic Taylor Swift ticket sale lead to DOJ filing a suit against the largest entertainment company in the world? In yet another example of how administrative law touches our everyday lives, we examine the DOJ’s pursuit to exercise its enforcement powers by pursuing antitrust claims against Live Nation and its subsidiary, Ticketmaster. Attorney Reb Masel from Rebuttal Podcast, joins us to discuss the legal framework that grants DOJ enforcement power and the extent to which DOJ—and other agencies—can wield it. Special thanks to ALR Staffers Linda Cullen, Peyton Kreuscher, and Maddie Haggard for their assistance with research and preparation for this episode.


    The transcript of this episode can be found here.


    Show Notes:

    • Follow Reb Maselon Instagram and TikTok and her podcast on YouTube. You can also listen to Rebuttal Podcast on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.
    • Guide to Antitrust Law: The Enforces, The Federal Trade Commission’s Official Website
    • Sam McCann, Everything You Need to Know About Consent Decrees, Vera (Aug. 30, 2023).
    • U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc. and Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (2010-2020)
    • U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc and Ticketmaster L.L.C. (2024)

    A Quick Look at the Administrative Procedure Act Jan 27, 2025
    Show notes

    In our second installment of our new “Quick Look” series, we review the Administrative Procedure Act—or APA—a vital statute that is key to navigating and influencing the regulatory world.

    Show Notes:

    Administrative Procedure Act, Pub L. No. 79-404, 324 Stat. 237 (1946) ACUS Sourcebook Judicial Review Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by Congressional Research Service Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases by Stephen G. Breyer, et al. George B. Shepherd, The Administrative Procedure Act Emerges from New Deal Politics, 90 Nw. L. Rev. 1557 (1996). The Federal Register

    A Hard Look at Project 2025: Part Two Nov 05, 2024
    Show notes

    Welcome back to A Hard Look! This offers a deeper dive into The Mandate for Leadership, also known as Project 2025. In Part Two, we analyze the document alongside experts Dr. Don Kettl and Dr. Jennifer Selin.


    Visit our website: https://administrativelawreview.org/podcast-a-hard-look/


    Learn more about our guests

    Jennifer Selin: Google Scholar Profile

    Don Kettl: LinkedIn


    Recommended Readings

    Heritage Foundation

    "Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise” by The Heritage Foundation (also known as Project 2025)

    Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024)

    “Constraining the Executive Branch: Congressional Use of the Courts in the Administrative State” by Jennifer Selin and Pamela Clouser McCann

    “The Importance of Removal Restrictions in a Schedule F World” by Jennifer Selin and Paul Verkuil

    “The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for the Twenty-First Century” by Donald Kettl

    “The Divided States of America” by Donald Kettl


    This episode was produced by the Administrative Law Review Senior Technology Editor, Sophia Navedo-Quinones, and Technology Editor, Victoria Paul. Thank you to American University Washington College of Law’s Professor Lubbers and Professor Popper for their guidance on this episode.


    If you have any questions about this episode or the podcast, or if you would like to propose a topic or guest, please e-mail us at ALR-Sr-Tech-Editor@wcl.american.edu.


    The transcript for this episode can be found here.


    A Hard Look at Project 2025: Part One Nov 03, 2024
    Show notes

    Welcome back to A Hard Look! This episode provides an objective overview of The Mandate for Leadership, also known as Project 2025. This is Part One, of our two-part series on Project 2025. Stay tuned for Part Two, which is a Q&A with legal and policy experts. ,


    Visit our website: https://administrativelawreview.org/podcast-a-hard-look/


    Recommended Readings

    Heritage Foundation

    Project 2025 by the Heritage Foundation

    Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024)


    This episode was produced by the Administrative Law Review Senior Technology Editor, Sophia Navedo-Quinones, and Technology Editor, Victoria Paul.


    If you have any questions about this episode or the podcast, or if you would like to propose a topic or guest, please e-mail us at ALR-Sr-Tech-Editor@wcl.american.edu.


    The transcript for this episode can be found here.


    A Quick Look at Administrative Law Oct 30, 2024
    Show notes

    Welcome back to A Hard Look! Listen to our first episode of our new “Quick Look” series, where we provide insight into foundational administrative law principles. In today’s episode, we start with basics and define administrative law, provide an overview of its principles, and discuss its development within the United States.

    Show Notes

    Visit our website: https://administrativelawreview.org/podcast-a-hard-look/


    Recommended Readings

    Administrative Law and Process in a Nutshell by ⁠Ronald M. Levin & Jeffrey S, Lubbers

    Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases by Stephen G. Breyer, et al.


    This episode was produced by the Administrative Law Review Senior Technology Editor, Sophia Navedo-Quinones, and Technology Editor, Victoria Paul. Thank you to Professor Jeffrey S. Lubbers at American University Washington College of Law for contributing to this episode's development.


    If you have any questions about this episode or the podcast, or if you would like to propose a topic or guest, please e-mail us at ALR-Sr-Tech-Editor@wcl.american.edu.


    Season 6 Trailer Oct 12, 2024
    Show notes

    A Hard Look, a podcast by the Administrative Law Review, covers recent events in administrative law, regulatory policy, and the critiques and praise of various regulations and their efficacy. This season, stand by for our new series: A Quick Look and A Hard Look at What's to Come, in addition to our traditional A Hard Look episodes!


    If you have any questions about the podcast, or if you would like to propose a topic or guest, please e-mail us at ALR-Sr-Tech-Editor@wcl.american.edu.


    Above the Law? Exploring Presidential Immunity from Criminal Prosecution Apr 23, 2024
    Show notes

    On this Episode of A Hard Look, Senior Technology Editor Bennett J. Nuss interviews Professor Mark Rotenberg regarding immunities provided to government officials, especially the President and Executive Branch. The conversation ranges from a history of official immunities in the United States, the distinctions between civil and criminal immunity, and rounding out with a discussion of the ongoing litigation against President Donald Trump within the D.C. Circuit.

    This episode was produced by ALR Technology Editor ⁠Anthony Aviza⁠.

    ---

    Recommended Reading:

    This Episode’s Transcript United States v. Trump Decision Nixon v. Fitzgerald Clinton v. Jones Trump v. Mazars

    Note: This episode was recorded before the Oral Arguments in Trump v. United States, which was rescheduled for April 25th, 2024 by the time this episode was published.


    The Real Effect of Regulatory Ambiguity Mar 15, 2024
    Show notes

    In this Episode of A Hard Look, ALR Senior Technology Editor, Bennett J. Nuss interviews Professor James Ridgway about the practical effects of an ambiguous ambiguity doctrine as promulgated by Chevron, using Veteran’s Law as a case example. This discussion ranges from a discussion of the history of Veterans Law, a critical examination of the motivators within administrative agencies which may contribute to ineffectiveness and court challenges, and theorizing about how iterative learning may improve agency rulemaking.

    This episode was produced by ALR Technology Editor Anthony Aviza.

    ---

    Recommended Reading:

    This Episode’s Transcript
    J.B. Rule and James Salzman, Mozart and the Red Queen: The Problem of Regulatory Accretion in the Administrative State. Kent Barnett and Christopher J. Walker, Chevron in the Circuit Courts

    If a military veteran you know is in need of assistance, you can find Vet Centers for Readjustment Counseling as well as information regarding benefits at www.va.gov.


    Previous 1 2 3 4 7 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights